Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas Reardon"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Harrias (pedantic, you're having a laugh?) |
imported>Montanabw (To prep 3) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from January 2015]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
| − | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|<font color="purple">(talk)</font>]]</sup> 05:00, 31 January 2015 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Thomas Reardon==== | ====Thomas Reardon==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Thomas Reardon|Thomas Reardon}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Thomas Reardon|Thomas Reardon}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that '''[[Thomas Reardon]]''' invented [[Internet Explorer]]? | * ... that '''[[Thomas Reardon]]''' invented [[Internet Explorer]]? | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* | :* | ||
<small>Created by [[User:Astro interest|Astro interest]] ([[User talk:Astro interest|talk]]). Self nominated at 01:22, 18 January 2015 (UTC)</small>. | <small>Created by [[User:Astro interest|Astro interest]] ([[User talk:Astro interest|talk]]). Self nominated at 01:22, 18 January 2015 (UTC)</small>. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New enough, long enough, meets core content policies. Hook directly cited to RS. No QPQ required here. Good to go. --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' 14:36, 18 January 2015 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New enough, long enough, meets core content policies. Hook directly cited to RS. No QPQ required here. Good to go. --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' 14:36, 18 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| Line 31: | Line 21: | ||
:::I find that a bit pedantic, but added nonetheless. [[User:Astro interest|Astro interest]] ([[User talk:Astro interest|talk]]) 23:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC) | :::I find that a bit pedantic, but added nonetheless. [[User:Astro interest|Astro interest]] ([[User talk:Astro interest|talk]]) 23:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
::::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Restoring tick, although I find it worrying that you consider that pedantic, given that it defeats the whole point of DYK. And more specifically, if the hook fact isn't in the article, then it clearly can't be cited inline in the article, which means it does not meet one of the fundamental criteria for DYK. [[User:Harrias|<b style="color:#00cc33">Harrias</b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Harrias|<span style="color:#009900">talk</span>]]</sup> 07:16, 29 January 2015 (UTC) | ::::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Restoring tick, although I find it worrying that you consider that pedantic, given that it defeats the whole point of DYK. And more specifically, if the hook fact isn't in the article, then it clearly can't be cited inline in the article, which means it does not meet one of the fundamental criteria for DYK. [[User:Harrias|<b style="color:#00cc33">Harrias</b>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Harrias|<span style="color:#009900">talk</span>]]</sup> 07:16, 29 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | *'''Promoter's comment''': Promoted with Alt hook</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | |
Latest revision as of 05:00, 31 January 2015
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Montanabw(talk) 05:00, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Thomas Reardon
- ... that Thomas Reardon invented Internet Explorer?
Created by Astro interest (talk). Self nominated at 01:22, 18 January 2015 (UTC).
I have pulled the hook from the prep area because of inaccuracy of the hook. See discussion at Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Browser wars. -Zanhe (talk) 04:09, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- ALT: ... that Thomas Reardon was for a time Microsoft's entire Internet Explorer development team?
Revised per concerns at Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Browser_wars. Astro interest (talk) 18:53, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Okay with that too (that's the actual wording used). --Jakob (talk) 13:36, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Unfortunately, while that might be the actual wording used in the reference, it doesn't appear in the article at all. As such, it clearly isn't appropriately cited in the article. Harrias talk 21:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- I find that a bit pedantic, but added nonetheless. Astro interest (talk) 23:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Restoring tick, although I find it worrying that you consider that pedantic, given that it defeats the whole point of DYK. And more specifically, if the hook fact isn't in the article, then it clearly can't be cited inline in the article, which means it does not meet one of the fundamental criteria for DYK. Harrias talk 07:16, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- I find that a bit pedantic, but added nonetheless. Astro interest (talk) 23:10, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
- Promoter's comment: Promoted with Alt hook