Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Timeline of troodontid research"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Abyssal
imported>Abyssal
Line 24: Line 24:
  
 
::*Review: [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Long enough, neutral and properly cited (AGF). Created in correct time and I like the hook. QPQ done and no evidence of copyvio. Doesn't affect this review, but I am curious as to why the lead image in the article is appropriate - as far as I can tell its just somebody's impression of what that dinosaur might have looked like - that's OK if you are a paleontologist, but otherwise it probably counts as original research.--[[User:Jackyd101|Jackyd101]] ([[User talk:Jackyd101|talk]]) 18:00, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 
::*Review: [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Long enough, neutral and properly cited (AGF). Created in correct time and I like the hook. QPQ done and no evidence of copyvio. Doesn't affect this review, but I am curious as to why the lead image in the article is appropriate - as far as I can tell its just somebody's impression of what that dinosaur might have looked like - that's OK if you are a paleontologist, but otherwise it probably counts as original research.--[[User:Jackyd101|Jackyd101]] ([[User talk:Jackyd101|talk]]) 18:00, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
::* I didn't make the image, but certain amounts of artistic license are accepted as a matter of course in Wikipedia's restorations of prehistoric life and are not regarded as OR violations. [[User:Abyssal|Abyssal]] ([[User talk:Abyssal|talk]]) 18:12, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
+
:::* I didn't make the image, but certain amounts of artistic license are accepted as a matter of course in Wikipedia's restorations of prehistoric life and are not regarded as OR violations. [[User:Abyssal|Abyssal]] ([[User talk:Abyssal|talk]]) 18:12, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 18:14, 27 May 2015

Timeline of troodontid research

Artist's restoration of the troodontid Byronosaurus

Created by Abyssal (talk). Self-nominated at 13:37, 11 May 2015 (UTC).

  • Review: Symbol voting keep.svg Long enough, neutral and properly cited (AGF). Created in correct time and I like the hook. QPQ done and no evidence of copyvio. Doesn't affect this review, but I am curious as to why the lead image in the article is appropriate - as far as I can tell its just somebody's impression of what that dinosaur might have looked like - that's OK if you are a paleontologist, but otherwise it probably counts as original research.--Jackyd101 (talk) 18:00, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
  • I didn't make the image, but certain amounts of artistic license are accepted as a matter of course in Wikipedia's restorations of prehistoric life and are not regarded as OR violations. Abyssal (talk) 18:12, 27 May 2015 (UTC)