Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Timeline of troodontid research"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Abyssal |
imported>Abyssal |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
::*Review: [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Long enough, neutral and properly cited (AGF). Created in correct time and I like the hook. QPQ done and no evidence of copyvio. Doesn't affect this review, but I am curious as to why the lead image in the article is appropriate - as far as I can tell its just somebody's impression of what that dinosaur might have looked like - that's OK if you are a paleontologist, but otherwise it probably counts as original research.--[[User:Jackyd101|Jackyd101]] ([[User talk:Jackyd101|talk]]) 18:00, 27 May 2015 (UTC) | ::*Review: [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Long enough, neutral and properly cited (AGF). Created in correct time and I like the hook. QPQ done and no evidence of copyvio. Doesn't affect this review, but I am curious as to why the lead image in the article is appropriate - as far as I can tell its just somebody's impression of what that dinosaur might have looked like - that's OK if you are a paleontologist, but otherwise it probably counts as original research.--[[User:Jackyd101|Jackyd101]] ([[User talk:Jackyd101|talk]]) 18:00, 27 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
| − | ::* I didn't make the image, but certain amounts of artistic license are accepted as a matter of course in Wikipedia's restorations of prehistoric life and are not regarded as OR violations. [[User:Abyssal|Abyssal]] ([[User talk:Abyssal|talk]]) 18:12, 27 May 2015 (UTC) | + | :::* I didn't make the image, but certain amounts of artistic license are accepted as a matter of course in Wikipedia's restorations of prehistoric life and are not regarded as OR violations. [[User:Abyssal|Abyssal]] ([[User talk:Abyssal|talk]]) 18:12, 27 May 2015 (UTC) |
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 18:14, 27 May 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Timeline of troodontid research
- ... that highlights from the history of troodontid research include the discovery that troodontids were among the brainiest dinosaurs, and Troodon nesting grounds in Montana?
Created by Abyssal (talk). Self-nominated at 13:37, 11 May 2015 (UTC).
- Review:
Long enough, neutral and properly cited (AGF). Created in correct time and I like the hook. QPQ done and no evidence of copyvio. Doesn't affect this review, but I am curious as to why the lead image in the article is appropriate - as far as I can tell its just somebody's impression of what that dinosaur might have looked like - that's OK if you are a paleontologist, but otherwise it probably counts as original research.--Jackyd101 (talk) 18:00, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- Review:
