Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Tomb of Ture Malmgren"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Iselilja m (Fixing style/layout errors) |
imported>Stamboliyski |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
::::No, you should't withdraw it. I asked a question about this [[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know&oldid=658867430#Notability_issues_and_Reviews|here (Notability issues and Reviews)]] and it seems notability is not relevant for DYK; so I am passing this on to another editor for review. Sorry for the inconvenience. I also accept what you say about the Wilhelm source as a traditional RS. | ::::No, you should't withdraw it. I asked a question about this [[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know&oldid=658867430#Notability_issues_and_Reviews|here (Notability issues and Reviews)]] and it seems notability is not relevant for DYK; so I am passing this on to another editor for review. Sorry for the inconvenience. I also accept what you say about the Wilhelm source as a traditional RS. | ||
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] I am withdrawing from this review. [[User:Iselilja|Iselilja]] ([[User talk:Iselilja|talk]]) 17:38, 23 April 2015 (UTC) | *[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] I am withdrawing from this review. [[User:Iselilja|Iselilja]] ([[User talk:Iselilja|talk]]) 17:38, 23 April 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::Apologies {{U|Iselilja}} – I'm not all too familiar with the processes here. Thank you for showing concern. [[User:Stamboliyski|Stamboliyski]] ([[User talk:Stamboliyski|talk]]) 17:44, 23 April 2015 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 17:44, 23 April 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Tomb of Ture Malmgren
- ... Ture Malmgren created a tomb (pictured) for himself by the foot of the mountain Fjällsätern, but was buried elsewhere by the local authorities after his death in 1922?
- Reviewed: Pentemont Abbey
- Comment: Hook is cited in the first paragraph. Picture was taken by me, and fully released into the public domain.
Created by Stamboliyski (talk). Self-nominated at 09:00, 23 April 2015 (UTC).
Article new and long enought, QPQ done. However, while this is interesting local history and the photo fine, I have serious concern about the notability of this tomb as a stand-alone article in English Wikipedia. The sources are rather weak; two of the sources are blogspot entries by a local association focused on Ture Malmgren; another souce Hansson, Wilhelm is off-line, but seems to be a kind of local history magazine, the fourth source is a newspaper article from 1922. And the article doesn't really say much about the tomb; it mostly says that it existed, but Malmgren was not enterred there; and a lot of the rest is general background info. I am afraid it seems to me that the existence of this tomb and the photo should simply be merged into the Ture Malmgren article. - Pinging Template:U - . Iselilja (talk) 12:15, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- I'll withdraw the nomination here if you want, but it certainly is notable as a public monument in the city. The website of the local history association are used as I could find nothing other on the modern-day status of being bricked-up, since I didn't want to do original research for that. The other two references from that page could easily be replaced by more in-depth references to books and other publications, if I just decided to bother digging through my bookcase. The Wilhelm source is not a "local history magazine", it is a legitimate history book written by the author of several other publications, repeatedly re-published due to its high public outreach. The 1922 newspaper article is used for easily-accessible (to me) background info, and can easily be replaced (as above). The tomb is written about in a number of other sources, mainly newspaper articles and reports from the 1930s all the way until the 1990s. None of these are digitalized, and not easily accessible to me as I now live in a separate city. Stamboliyski (talk) 14:24, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- No, you should't withdraw it. I asked a question about this [(Notability issues and Reviews)] and it seems notability is not relevant for DYK; so I am passing this on to another editor for review. Sorry for the inconvenience. I also accept what you say about the Wilhelm source as a traditional RS.
- Apologies Template:U – I'm not all too familiar with the processes here. Thank you for showing concern. Stamboliyski (talk) 17:44, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
