Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Train of Tomorrow"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Cwmhiraeth (To Prep 4) |
imported>Headbomb m (→Train of Tomorrow: clean up, this is no longer needed, replaced: |ref=harv} → }) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
<small>Moved to mainspace by [[User:Michael Barera|Michael Barera]] ([[User talk:Michael Barera|talk]]). Self-nominated at 06:31, 21 January 2017 (UTC).</small> | <small>Moved to mainspace by [[User:Michael Barera|Michael Barera]] ([[User talk:Michael Barera|talk]]). Self-nominated at 06:31, 21 January 2017 (UTC).</small> | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
− | *{{wikicite |ref=Morgan |reference={{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=o0EfAQAAIAAJ|title=The Train of Tomorrow|last=Morgan|first=Ric|publisher=[[Indiana University Press]]|year=2007|isbn=9780253348425|location=[[Bloomington, Indiana]] | + | *{{wikicite |ref=Morgan |reference={{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=o0EfAQAAIAAJ|title=The Train of Tomorrow|last=Morgan|first=Ric|publisher=[[Indiana University Press]]|year=2007|isbn=9780253348425|location=[[Bloomington, Indiana]]}}}} |
:* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] New enough in mainspace. Certainly long enough & seems neutral. I gave up trying to find hook refs in the very long article - ALT1 is in the lead but not refed there. AGF on offline sources quoted here, I'm sure they're in there somewhere. Personally I prefer ALT1 & 2, in that order. Both pics seem ok to use, with AGF on General Motors or whoever it was not renewing copyright. Earwig says: "Violation Unlikely, 6.5% confidence". GA ready, GTG. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 21:14, 21 January 2017 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] New enough in mainspace. Certainly long enough & seems neutral. I gave up trying to find hook refs in the very long article - ALT1 is in the lead but not refed there. AGF on offline sources quoted here, I'm sure they're in there somewhere. Personally I prefer ALT1 & 2, in that order. Both pics seem ok to use, with AGF on General Motors or whoever it was not renewing copyright. Earwig says: "Violation Unlikely, 6.5% confidence". GA ready, GTG. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 21:14, 21 January 2017 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 05:15, 14 November 2020
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:17, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Train of Tomorrow
- ... that the domes of the Train of Tomorrow (pictured) were inspired by a ride in an F-unit or a caboose's cupola in the Rocky Mountains? Source: [1][2][3]
- ALT1:... that the Train of Tomorrow (pictured) was the first new train to consist entirely of dome cars? Source: [4]
- ALT2:... that the Train of Tomorrow's lounge-observation car Moon Glow (pictured) sat in a scrap yard for 18 years before being discovered by the National Railway Historical Society? Source: [5]
- Reviewed: Robyn Love
- Comment: If using ALT2, please use the image File:Train of Tomorrow Moon Glow observation car.jpg instead of the thumbnail image.
Moved to mainspace by Michael Barera (talk). Self-nominated at 06:31, 21 January 2017 (UTC).
- ↑ Solomon, Brian (2006). EMD Locomotives. Saint Paul, Minnesota: Voyageur Press. p. 11. ISBN 1610603796.
- ↑ Morgan 2007, p. 3
- ↑ Morgan 2007, p. 4
- ↑ Morgan 2007, p. 77
- ↑ Morgan 2007, pp. 66–67
- Morgan, Ric (2007). The Train of Tomorrow. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press. ISBN 9780253348425.
New enough in mainspace. Certainly long enough & seems neutral. I gave up trying to find hook refs in the very long article - ALT1 is in the lead but not refed there. AGF on offline sources quoted here, I'm sure they're in there somewhere. Personally I prefer ALT1 & 2, in that order. Both pics seem ok to use, with AGF on General Motors or whoever it was not renewing copyright. Earwig says: "Violation Unlikely, 6.5% confidence". GA ready, GTG. Johnbod (talk) 21:14, 21 January 2017 (UTC)