Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Trinity plantation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ritchie333 (all done then) |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (To Prep 5) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from May 2019]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
| − | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 06:28, 22 June 2019 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Trinity plantation==== | ====Trinity plantation==== | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img"> | <div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img"> | ||
{{main page image|image=Hakewill, A Picturesque Tour of the Island of Jamaica, Plate 12.jpg|caption=Trinity plantation and aqueduct|width=133x150}} | {{main page image|image=Hakewill, A Picturesque Tour of the Island of Jamaica, Plate 12.jpg|caption=Trinity plantation and aqueduct|width=133x150}} | ||
| − | </div | + | </div> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that an aqueduct ''(pictured)'' of over a mile in length was built to supply '''[[Trinity plantation]]''' in Jamaica with water? | * ... that an aqueduct ''(pictured)'' of over a mile in length was built to supply '''[[Trinity plantation]]''' in Jamaica with water? | ||
** '''ALT1''':... that ...? | ** '''ALT1''':... that ...? | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Tito's Tacos|Tito's Tacos]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Tito's Tacos|Tito's Tacos]] | ||
<small>Created by [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) and [[User:Whispyhistory|Whispyhistory]] ([[User talk:Whispyhistory|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) at 21:30, 19 May 2019 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) and [[User:Whispyhistory|Whispyhistory]] ([[User talk:Whispyhistory|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) at 21:30, 19 May 2019 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* <s>[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]]</s> The article is new and long enough, there are no copyright concerns, the picture dates from the 19th century so clearly out of copyright, and the hook is interesting. However, the [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=v_sPBnsQXV8C&pg=PA116&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false source given] says it was an [[aqueduct]], not a viaduct, and says it was "over a mile" in length, not just a mile. Can the hook be changed to reflect this? Additionally, why does the lead refer to the article subject as simply "Trinity" instead of "Trinity plantation"? [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 15:11, 28 May 2019 (UTC) | :* <s>[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]]</s> The article is new and long enough, there are no copyright concerns, the picture dates from the 19th century so clearly out of copyright, and the hook is interesting. However, the [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=v_sPBnsQXV8C&pg=PA116&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false source given] says it was an [[aqueduct]], not a viaduct, and says it was "over a mile" in length, not just a mile. Can the hook be changed to reflect this? Additionally, why does the lead refer to the article subject as simply "Trinity" instead of "Trinity plantation"? [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 15:11, 28 May 2019 (UTC) | ||
:::{{ping|Ritchie333}} Thanks, changed to aqueduct which is what I intended to type in the first place. I am open to alternative wordings on the hook. Plantation in the article title is a disambiguator. It could be in brackets I guess. The sources variously show Trinity, Trinity Plantation, and Trinity Estate, and that seems to be the case with other plantations too. In the historic sources they seem mainly to go just by the shortest possible name. [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) 17:43, 28 May 2019 (UTC) | :::{{ping|Ritchie333}} Thanks, changed to aqueduct which is what I intended to type in the first place. I am open to alternative wordings on the hook. Plantation in the article title is a disambiguator. It could be in brackets I guess. The sources variously show Trinity, Trinity Plantation, and Trinity Estate, and that seems to be the case with other plantations too. In the historic sources they seem mainly to go just by the shortest possible name. [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) 17:43, 28 May 2019 (UTC) | ||
::::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Okay, that's all resolved then. I'm not good with hooks, hopefully somebody will spot the nom and suggest one. [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 17:45, 28 May 2019 (UTC) | ::::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Okay, that's all resolved then. I'm not good with hooks, hopefully somebody will spot the nom and suggest one. [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 17:45, 28 May 2019 (UTC) | ||
| − | {{-}} | + | {{-}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 06:28, 22 June 2019
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:28, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Trinity plantation
- ... that an aqueduct (pictured) of over a mile in length was built to supply Trinity plantation in Jamaica with water?
- ALT1:... that ...?
- Reviewed: Tito's Tacos
Created by Philafrenzy (talk) and Whispyhistory (talk). Nominated by Philafrenzy (talk) at 21:30, 19 May 2019 (UTC).
The article is new and long enough, there are no copyright concerns, the picture dates from the 19th century so clearly out of copyright, and the hook is interesting. However, the source given says it was an aqueduct, not a viaduct, and says it was "over a mile" in length, not just a mile. Can the hook be changed to reflect this? Additionally, why does the lead refer to the article subject as simply "Trinity" instead of "Trinity plantation"? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:11, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Thanks, changed to aqueduct which is what I intended to type in the first place. I am open to alternative wordings on the hook. Plantation in the article title is a disambiguator. It could be in brackets I guess. The sources variously show Trinity, Trinity Plantation, and Trinity Estate, and that seems to be the case with other plantations too. In the historic sources they seem mainly to go just by the shortest possible name. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:43, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Okay, that's all resolved then. I'm not good with hooks, hopefully somebody will spot the nom and suggest one. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:45, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Thanks, changed to aqueduct which is what I intended to type in the first place. I am open to alternative wordings on the hook. Plantation in the article title is a disambiguator. It could be in brackets I guess. The sources variously show Trinity, Trinity Plantation, and Trinity Estate, and that seems to be the case with other plantations too. In the historic sources they seem mainly to go just by the shortest possible name. Philafrenzy (talk) 17:43, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
