Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Truth in Music Advertising"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
— Calvin999 09:04, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
imported>Calvin999 m (GTG) |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (To Prep 4) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from July 2017]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
| − | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | |2 | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 05:31, 2 August 2017 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Truth in Music Advertising==== | ====Truth in Music Advertising==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Truth in Music Advertising|Truth in Music Advertising}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Truth in Music Advertising|Truth in Music Advertising}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that former [[Sha Na Na]] member [[Jon Bauman|Jon "Bowzer" Bauman]] was the co-author of '''[[Truth in Music Advertising]]''' legislation in most of the [[United States]]? | * ... that former [[Sha Na Na]] member [[Jon Bauman|Jon "Bowzer" Bauman]] was the co-author of '''[[Truth in Music Advertising]]''' legislation in most of the [[United States]]? | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[:Template:Did you know nominations/The Tombs of Atuan]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[:Template:Did you know nominations/The Tombs of Atuan]] | ||
<small>Created by [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]). Self-nominated at 23:57, 9 July 2017 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]). Self-nominated at 23:57, 9 July 2017 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
*Article as created and nominated on 9 July, 2017. | *Article as created and nominated on 9 July, 2017. | ||
| Line 23: | Line 15: | ||
*However, I can't see where the source is for it being enacted in 34 of the 50 states? I presumed there would be one in the lead at the end of either of these sentences "and promoted by him and Mary Wilson of the Supremes, was not passed by the U.S. Congress, but has been enacted in 34 of the 50 states. The legislation has been tested in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit." I can't see any other mention of '34' or '50' elsewhere to check it either. [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] — [[User:Calvin999|<b style="color:#595454">Calvin999</b>]] 15:33, 31 July 2017 (UTC) | *However, I can't see where the source is for it being enacted in 34 of the 50 states? I presumed there would be one in the lead at the end of either of these sentences "and promoted by him and Mary Wilson of the Supremes, was not passed by the U.S. Congress, but has been enacted in 34 of the 50 states. The legislation has been tested in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit." I can't see any other mention of '34' or '50' elsewhere to check it either. [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] — [[User:Calvin999|<b style="color:#595454">Calvin999</b>]] 15:33, 31 July 2017 (UTC) | ||
::Sorry about that, {{u|Calvin999}}, I thought I had copied one of the primary source websites ([http://vocalgroup.org/truth-in-music/ 1], [https://bowzerparty.com/about 2]) as a named reference there – both of them say 34 states. But better than primary is the secondary source I provided just now, a newspaper article which says 34 states. [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]) 18:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC) | ::Sorry about that, {{u|Calvin999}}, I thought I had copied one of the primary source websites ([http://vocalgroup.org/truth-in-music/ 1], [https://bowzerparty.com/about 2]) as a named reference there – both of them say 34 states. But better than primary is the secondary source I provided just now, a newspaper article which says 34 states. [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]) 18:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC) | ||
| − | [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] — [[User:Calvin999|<b style="color:#595454">Calvin999</b>]] 09:04, 1 August 2017 (UTC) | + | [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] — [[User:Calvin999|<b style="color:#595454">Calvin999</b>]] 09:04, 1 August 2017 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 05:31, 2 August 2017
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:31, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Truth in Music Advertising
- ... that former Sha Na Na member Jon "Bowzer" Bauman was the co-author of Truth in Music Advertising legislation in most of the United States?
Created by Binksternet (talk). Self-nominated at 23:57, 9 July 2017 (UTC).
- Article as created and nominated on 9 July, 2017.
- Exceeds minimum character threshold.
- Hook is neutral and within length limit.
- However, I can't see where the source is for it being enacted in 34 of the 50 states? I presumed there would be one in the lead at the end of either of these sentences "and promoted by him and Mary Wilson of the Supremes, was not passed by the U.S. Congress, but has been enacted in 34 of the 50 states. The legislation has been tested in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit." I can't see any other mention of '34' or '50' elsewhere to check it either.
— Calvin999 15:33, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, Template:U, I thought I had copied one of the primary source websites (1, 2) as a named reference there – both of them say 34 states. But better than primary is the secondary source I provided just now, a newspaper article which says 34 states. Binksternet (talk) 18:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)