Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/United States v. Hatter"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>BD2412
m (→‎United States v. Hatter: minor fixes, mostly disambig links using AWB)
imported>SporkBot
m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content)
 
Line 5: Line 5:
 
====United States v. Hatter====
 
====United States v. Hatter====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=United States v. Hatter|United States v. Hatter}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=United States v. Hatter|United States v. Hatter}}
{{*mp}}... that the [[United States Supreme Court]] upheld a requirement that federal judges have to pay taxes for [[Medicare (United States)|Medicare]] in '''[[United States v. Hatter]]'''?
+
*... that the [[United States Supreme Court]] upheld a requirement that federal judges have to pay taxes for [[Medicare (United States)|Medicare]] in '''[[United States v. Hatter]]'''?
 
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/2012 ABL Regular Season|2012 ABL Regular Season]]
 
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/2012 ABL Regular Season|2012 ABL Regular Season]]
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:Lord Roem|Lord Roem]] ([[User talk:Lord Roem|talk]]).  Self nom at 04:44, 29 December 2011 (UTC)</small>
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:Lord Roem|Lord Roem]] ([[User talk:Lord Roem|talk]]).  Self nom at 04:44, 29 December 2011 (UTC)</small>
  
 
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New, long enough and adequately cited.--[[User:DavidCane|DavidCane]] ([[User talk:DavidCane|talk]]) 21:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New, long enough and adequately cited.--[[User:DavidCane|DavidCane]] ([[User talk:DavidCane|talk]]) 21:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 00:48, 8 March 2018

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 15:36, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

United States v. Hatter

Created/expanded by Lord Roem (talk). Self nom at 04:44, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

  • Symbol confirmed.svg New, long enough and adequately cited.--DavidCane (talk) 21:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)