Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Uppsala House"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset (new reviewer needed) |
imported>Soman (cmt) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Reviewer needed to finish this review, including areas required for DYK but not covered in initial checks such as neutrality and close paraphrasing. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 16:12, 18 January 2014 (UTC) | *[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Reviewer needed to finish this review, including areas required for DYK but not covered in initial checks such as neutrality and close paraphrasing. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 16:12, 18 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | **Just to be clear, it was the municipality of Uppsala that signed the deal, not the people in an abstract sense. ALT hook needed. --[[User:Soman|Soman]] ([[User talk:Soman|talk]]) 04:08, 27 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 04:08, 27 January 2014
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Uppsala House
- ... that the people of Uppsala in Sweden helped
payto renovate Uppsala House (pictured) in Estonia?
- Reviewed: BBC First World War centenary season
Created by Victuallers (talk). Self nominated at 12:14, 27 December 2013 (UTC).
New; length and citations good. However, article says only "agreed a joint programme to cooperate in the 'Restoration of Old Buildings' initiative", with no mention of payment; the source likewise. [New reviewer; second opinions welcome] Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:31, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- I've removed the payment from the hook. I think its very unlikely that Uppsala did this using 100% Estonian money but I guess we need to be precise. Victuallers (talk) 20:14, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Reviewer needed to finish this review, including areas required for DYK but not covered in initial checks such as neutrality and close paraphrasing. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:12, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
