Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Ursa Minor"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Casliber (Oops, some last-minute ref-hunting. Fixed now) |
imported>Miyagawa (Completed review) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Offline source for hook fact taken in good faith, the article is newly promoted and is fully cited. A QPQ has been completed and spot checks yield no concerns. However, I wanted to check before giving a tick - should the bare urls be displayed in the first two citations? [[User:Miyagawa|Miyagawa]] ([[User talk:Miyagawa|talk]]) 13:13, 28 June 2015 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Offline source for hook fact taken in good faith, the article is newly promoted and is fully cited. A QPQ has been completed and spot checks yield no concerns. However, I wanted to check before giving a tick - should the bare urls be displayed in the first two citations? [[User:Miyagawa|Miyagawa]] ([[User talk:Miyagawa|talk]]) 13:13, 28 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
::*Oops, some last-minute ref-hunting. Fixed now. [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 14:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC) | ::*Oops, some last-minute ref-hunting. Fixed now. [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 14:36, 28 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Good to go then. :) [[User:Miyagawa|Miyagawa]] ([[User talk:Miyagawa|talk]]) 18:19, 1 July 2015 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 18:19, 1 July 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Ursa Minor
- ... that the north celestial pole is located in Ursa Minor (pictured)?
Improved to Good Article status by Casliber (talk). Self-nominated at 09:11, 28 June 2015 (UTC).
Offline source for hook fact taken in good faith, the article is newly promoted and is fully cited. A QPQ has been completed and spot checks yield no concerns. However, I wanted to check before giving a tick - should the bare urls be displayed in the first two citations? Miyagawa (talk) 13:13, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
