Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Cwmhiraeth
(Passed for DYK, sorry for the long delay)
imported>Fuebaey
(promoted to prep 5)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from November 2014]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=November 2014
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Fuebaey|Fuebaey]] ([[User talk:Fuebaey|talk]]) 13:51, 2 January 2015 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014====
 
====Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014|Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014|Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014}}
 
<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;">
 
<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;">
</div><!-- 
+
</div>
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that because no candidate won a majority of the vote, the '''[[Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014|2014 Vermont gubernatorial election]]''' will be decided by the [[Vermont General Assembly]]?
 
* ... that because no candidate won a majority of the vote, the '''[[Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014|2014 Vermont gubernatorial election]]''' will be decided by the [[Vermont General Assembly]]?
<!--
 
-->
 
 
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Von Sydow murders|Von Sydow murders]]. [[User:Tiller54|Tiller54]] ([[User talk:Tiller54|talk]]) 11:11, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Von Sydow murders|Von Sydow murders]]. [[User:Tiller54|Tiller54]] ([[User talk:Tiller54|talk]]) 11:11, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Tiller54|Tiller54]] ([[User talk:Tiller54|talk]]). Self nominated at 22:30, 11 November 2014 (UTC)</small>.
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Tiller54|Tiller54]] ([[User talk:Tiller54|talk]]). Self nominated at 22:30, 11 November 2014 (UTC)</small>.
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014|Tiller54}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* Sorry to say it, but I don't think the first slot should be wasted on what is essentially a "B-roll" establishing shot. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 05:12, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 
:* Sorry to say it, but I don't think the first slot should be wasted on what is essentially a "B-roll" establishing shot. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 05:12, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Line 33: Line 24:
 
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] This article is new enough (or was new enough when nominated!) and long enough. The hook is uncontroversial and supported by many sources. The article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 07:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] This article is new enough (or was new enough when nominated!) and long enough. The hook is uncontroversial and supported by many sources. The article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 07:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
  
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
{{-}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 13:51, 2 January 2015

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Fuebaey (talk) 13:51, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014

5x expanded by Tiller54 (talk). Self nominated at 22:30, 11 November 2014 (UTC).

  • Sorry to say it, but I don't think the first slot should be wasted on what is essentially a "B-roll" establishing shot. EEng (talk) 05:12, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Sorry but I don't know what you're referring to (this is my first DYK nomination). Tiller54 (talk) 11:41, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • 16px I don't know what B-roll means. However, the expansion is not fivefold. The November 10 edition was 1480 prose bytes (or the Nov 11 edition was 1644 prose bytes). The current version is 4917 prose bytes. That is less than fourfold. If you can expand it to fivefold, the article can be reviewed again. Otherwise, the nomination will fail. --George Ho (talk) 06:22, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • How about now? Tiller54 (talk) 11:41, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
I mean that having a picture of the state house doesn't really add anything. It's like when the news is talking about the president meeting with Joe Smith, but for some reason they don't have any footage of the president meeting with Joe Smith, so they just present a shot of the White House while the newscaster talks. (Don't think everyone at DYK is grumpy like me. I just haven't had my coffee.) EEng (talk) 13:16, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Would a picture of Governor Shumlin be a better option? Tiller54 (talk) 13:38, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
I recommend skipping the picture altogether. EEng (talk) 14:11, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Okie dokie Tiller54 (talk) 20:13, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Over 9000 bytes which meets fivefold requirement. Time for someone else to re-review this. --George Ho (talk) 03:57, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Any update on this? Tiller54 (talk) 17:42, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg This article is new enough (or was new enough when nominated!) and long enough. The hook is uncontroversial and supported by many sources. The article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)