Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Vice News Tonight"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Graeme Bartlett
(ok)
imported>Yoninah
(to Prep 6)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from October 2016]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=October 2016  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 23:14, 27 December 2016 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Vice News Tonight====
 
====Vice News Tonight====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Vice News Tonight|Vice News Tonight}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Vice News Tonight|Vice News Tonight}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* <s>that the new [[HBO]] daily news series '''''[[Vice News Tonight]]''''' has already been given a three-year commitment from the network?</s>
 
* <s>that the new [[HBO]] daily news series '''''[[Vice News Tonight]]''''' has already been given a three-year commitment from the network?</s>
 
** '''ALT1''': ... that [[HBO]]'s new daily news series '''''[[Vice News Tonight]]''''' was intended by [[Vice News]] to have "no ads, no anchors and no censors?"
 
** '''ALT1''': ... that [[HBO]]'s new daily news series '''''[[Vice News Tonight]]''''' was intended by [[Vice News]] to have "no ads, no anchors and no censors?"
 
:*
 
:*
 
<small>Created by [[User:Fireflyfanboy|Fireflyfanboy]] ([[User talk:Fireflyfanboy|talk]]). Self-nominated at 07:28, 25 October 2016 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created by [[User:Fireflyfanboy|Fireflyfanboy]] ([[User talk:Fireflyfanboy|talk]]). Self-nominated at 07:28, 25 October 2016 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Vice News Tonight|Fireflyfanboy|subpage=Vice News Tonight}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Note that the main hook is not interesting or surprising, but we can give alt1 a shot. The article is big enough but only just.  It is padded with plenty of quotes that the tool fails to exclude, but the original text is 1600 characters. However it is a little bit late - 8 days and 5 hours at nom time. Started  02:10, 17 October 2016 nominated 07:28, 25 October 2016. I notice the first DYK attempted was too late by a long way.  This is the third DYK nomination, so no QPQ is needed yet. Earlier claims of hoax and lack of notability have proved false. I am slightly concerned about neutrality, as most of the reviews have been a bit insulting. Has this changed? The hook ALT1 is in the article, cited and confirmed. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 09:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Note that the main hook is not interesting or surprising, but we can give alt1 a shot. The article is big enough but only just.  It is padded with plenty of quotes that the tool fails to exclude, but the original text is 1600 characters. However it is a little bit late - 8 days and 5 hours at nom time. Started  02:10, 17 October 2016 nominated 07:28, 25 October 2016. I notice the first DYK attempted was too late by a long way.  This is the third DYK nomination, so no QPQ is needed yet. Earlier claims of hoax and lack of notability have proved false. I am slightly concerned about neutrality, as most of the reviews have been a bit insulting. Has this changed? The hook ALT1 is in the article, cited and confirmed. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 09:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Line 24: Line 16:
 
:::*Since some time has passed, perhaps there are more reviews available to see if they really are mostly negative. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 21:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 
:::*Since some time has passed, perhaps there are more reviews available to see if they really are mostly negative. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 21:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 
::::*I added a negative review from CNNMoney, does that improve things at all?[[User:Fireflyfanboy|Fireflyfanboy]] ([[User talk:Fireflyfanboy|talk]]) 19:45, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
 
::::*I added a negative review from CNNMoney, does that improve things at all?[[User:Fireflyfanboy|Fireflyfanboy]] ([[User talk:Fireflyfanboy|talk]]) 19:45, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
:::::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] I will withdraw my comment about neutrality then. Can you convert some more of the quotes in the Development section to your own writing? Anyway it can proceed to DYK. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 21:21, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
+
:::::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] I will withdraw my comment about neutrality then. Can you convert some more of the quotes in the Development section to your own writing? Anyway it can proceed to DYK. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 21:21, 27 December 2016 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 23:14, 27 December 2016

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:14, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Vice News Tonight

  • that the new HBO daily news series Vice News Tonight has already been given a three-year commitment from the network?

Created by Fireflyfanboy (talk). Self-nominated at 07:28, 25 October 2016 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Note that the main hook is not interesting or surprising, but we can give alt1 a shot. The article is big enough but only just. It is padded with plenty of quotes that the tool fails to exclude, but the original text is 1600 characters. However it is a little bit late - 8 days and 5 hours at nom time. Started 02:10, 17 October 2016 nominated 07:28, 25 October 2016. I notice the first DYK attempted was too late by a long way. This is the third DYK nomination, so no QPQ is needed yet. Earlier claims of hoax and lack of notability have proved false. I am slightly concerned about neutrality, as most of the reviews have been a bit insulting. Has this changed? The hook ALT1 is in the article, cited and confirmed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
I'd be fine with ALT1 if that's the preferable blurb!Fireflyfanboy (talk) 23:34, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
  • Since some time has passed, perhaps there are more reviews available to see if they really are mostly negative. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
  • I added a negative review from CNNMoney, does that improve things at all?Fireflyfanboy (talk) 19:45, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg I will withdraw my comment about neutrality then. Can you convert some more of the quotes in the Development section to your own writing? Anyway it can proceed to DYK. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:21, 27 December 2016 (UTC)