Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Vine Street, London"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Ritchie333
(replies)
imported>BlueMoonset
(full review needed)
Line 31: Line 31:
 
:::::No idea, ask {{ping|Philafrenzy}} who uploaded it on Commons. [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 11:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 
:::::No idea, ask {{ping|Philafrenzy}} who uploaded it on Commons. [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 11:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 
:::*That's basically it. Thanks, [[User:Tomandjerry211 (alt)|Tomandjerry211 (alt)]] ([[User talk:Tomandjerry211 (alt)|talk]]) 20:26, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 
:::*That's basically it. Thanks, [[User:Tomandjerry211 (alt)|Tomandjerry211 (alt)]] ([[User talk:Tomandjerry211 (alt)|talk]]) 20:26, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 +
 +
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  Full review needed that explicitly lists what was checked, since even the re-review doesn't do this, mentioning some non-DYK criteria (this is not a GAN, and paragraph size is not mentioned for DYK). As best I can see, the second image in the article does at present have a US PD license, but the reviewer should double check. Thanks. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 15:52, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 15:52, 21 August 2015

Vine Street, London

5x expanded by Ritchie333 (talk). Self-nominated at 21:30, 18 July 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg I think it would be helpful if you explicitly listed what you have checked, ie: date expanded, article length, verifiability of hooks and suitability of prose, copyvio checks etc - otherwise the prep builders may be suspicious and send it back. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:11, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg Actually there are a few problems:
  • Duplicate links to Marlborough Street Magistrates Court and Regents Street
Done Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
  • "curtailed" seems unclear, "shortened" seems clearer to many people.
Copyedited this bit Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
  • The first three paragraphs in the last section are too short.
I don't believe (unless Template:Ping can clarify) that that's part of the DYK criteria, and the trials and tribulations of Oscar Wilde are best left to his own article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
  • The second image requires an US PD tag.
No idea, ask Template:Ping who uploaded it on Commons. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed that explicitly lists what was checked, since even the re-review doesn't do this, mentioning some non-DYK criteria (this is not a GAN, and paragraph size is not mentioned for DYK). As best I can see, the second image in the article does at present have a US PD license, but the reviewer should double check. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:52, 21 August 2015 (UTC)