Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Vine Street, London"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ritchie333 (replies) |
imported>BlueMoonset (full review needed) |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
:::::No idea, ask {{ping|Philafrenzy}} who uploaded it on Commons. [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 11:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC) | :::::No idea, ask {{ping|Philafrenzy}} who uploaded it on Commons. [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 11:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::*That's basically it. Thanks, [[User:Tomandjerry211 (alt)|Tomandjerry211 (alt)]] ([[User talk:Tomandjerry211 (alt)|talk]]) 20:26, 7 August 2015 (UTC) | :::*That's basically it. Thanks, [[User:Tomandjerry211 (alt)|Tomandjerry211 (alt)]] ([[User talk:Tomandjerry211 (alt)|talk]]) 20:26, 7 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | *[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Full review needed that explicitly lists what was checked, since even the re-review doesn't do this, mentioning some non-DYK criteria (this is not a GAN, and paragraph size is not mentioned for DYK). As best I can see, the second image in the article does at present have a US PD license, but the reviewer should double check. Thanks. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 15:52, 21 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 15:52, 21 August 2015
DYK toolbox |
---|
Vine Street, London
- ... that Vine Street has seen erotic asphyxiation, libel charges against Oscar Wilde and a square on the British Monopoly board?
- Reviewed: Lola (song)
5x expanded by Ritchie333 (talk). Self-nominated at 21:30, 18 July 2015 (UTC).
Good to go.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 23:38, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
I think it would be helpful if you explicitly listed what you have checked, ie: date expanded, article length, verifiability of hooks and suitability of prose, copyvio checks etc - otherwise the prep builders may be suspicious and send it back. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:11, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
-
- Duplicate links to Marlborough Street Magistrates Court and Regents Street
- Done Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- "curtailed" seems unclear, "shortened" seems clearer to many people.
- Copyedited this bit Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- The first three paragraphs in the last section are too short.
- I don't believe (unless Template:Ping can clarify) that that's part of the DYK criteria, and the trials and tribulations of Oscar Wilde are best left to his own article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- The second image requires an US PD tag.
- No idea, ask Template:Ping who uploaded it on Commons. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- That's basically it. Thanks, Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 20:26, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
Full review needed that explicitly lists what was checked, since even the re-review doesn't do this, mentioning some non-DYK criteria (this is not a GAN, and paragraph size is not mentioned for DYK). As best I can see, the second image in the article does at present have a US PD license, but the reviewer should double check. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:52, 21 August 2015 (UTC)