Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Vine Street, London"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset
(full review needed)
imported>Maile66
(Good 2 go)
Line 33: Line 33:
  
 
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  Full review needed that explicitly lists what was checked, since even the re-review doesn't do this, mentioning some non-DYK criteria (this is not a GAN, and paragraph size is not mentioned for DYK). As best I can see, the second image in the article does at present have a US PD license, but the reviewer should double check. Thanks. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 15:52, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  Full review needed that explicitly lists what was checked, since even the re-review doesn't do this, mentioning some non-DYK criteria (this is not a GAN, and paragraph size is not mentioned for DYK). As best I can see, the second image in the article does at present have a US PD license, but the reviewer should double check. Thanks. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 15:52, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 +
 +
:<u>'''The following has been checked in this review by Maile'''</u>
 +
:*QPQ by Ritchie333
 +
:<u>Eligibility</u>
 +
:*Article created by Skyring on August 8, 2005, and was a 299 character Stub before expansion by nominator
 +
:*On nomination date of July 18, 2015,  article had reached 5523 characters (0 words) "readable prose size"
 +
:*Article is NPOV, currently stable, no edit wars, no dispute tags
 +
:<u>Sourcing</u>
 +
:*Every paragraph sourced inline, both online and offline
 +
:*No bare URLs, and no external links used as inline sources
 +
:<u>Hook</u>
 +
:*Hook is 123 characters, NPOV, stated in three places under "Events" section, and appropriately sourced where stated.
 +
:<u>Image</u>
 +
:*No image in the hook
 +
:<u>Tools</u>
 +
:*Duplication Detector on all online sources found no copyvio or close paraphrasing.
 +
[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Everything passes DYK criteria as stated above.  G2G. [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 20:26, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 20:27, 28 August 2015

Vine Street, London

5x expanded by Ritchie333 (talk). Self-nominated at 21:30, 18 July 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg I think it would be helpful if you explicitly listed what you have checked, ie: date expanded, article length, verifiability of hooks and suitability of prose, copyvio checks etc - otherwise the prep builders may be suspicious and send it back. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:11, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg Actually there are a few problems:
  • Duplicate links to Marlborough Street Magistrates Court and Regents Street
Done Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
  • "curtailed" seems unclear, "shortened" seems clearer to many people.
Copyedited this bit Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
  • The first three paragraphs in the last section are too short.
I don't believe (unless Template:Ping can clarify) that that's part of the DYK criteria, and the trials and tribulations of Oscar Wilde are best left to his own article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
  • The second image requires an US PD tag.
No idea, ask Template:Ping who uploaded it on Commons. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed that explicitly lists what was checked, since even the re-review doesn't do this, mentioning some non-DYK criteria (this is not a GAN, and paragraph size is not mentioned for DYK). As best I can see, the second image in the article does at present have a US PD license, but the reviewer should double check. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:52, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
The following has been checked in this review by Maile
  • QPQ by Ritchie333
Eligibility
  • Article created by Skyring on August 8, 2005, and was a 299 character Stub before expansion by nominator
  • On nomination date of July 18, 2015, article had reached 5523 characters (0 words) "readable prose size"
  • Article is NPOV, currently stable, no edit wars, no dispute tags
Sourcing
  • Every paragraph sourced inline, both online and offline
  • No bare URLs, and no external links used as inline sources
Hook
  • Hook is 123 characters, NPOV, stated in three places under "Events" section, and appropriately sourced where stated.
Image
  • No image in the hook
Tools
  • Duplication Detector on all online sources found no copyvio or close paraphrasing.

Symbol confirmed.svg Everything passes DYK criteria as stated above. G2G. — Maile (talk) 20:26, 28 August 2015 (UTC)