Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Wang Guanzhong"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Zanhe (reply) |
imported>Feminist (Acceptable) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] Hook is uninteresting and has neutrality concerns. <span style="color:black">[[User:Sovereign Sentinel|sovereign]]°[[User talk:Sovereign Sentinel|sentinel]] [[Special:Contributions/Sovereign Sentinel|(contribs)]]</span> 07:27, 3 September 2015 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] Hook is uninteresting and has neutrality concerns. <span style="color:black">[[User:Sovereign Sentinel|sovereign]]°[[User talk:Sovereign Sentinel|sentinel]] [[Special:Contributions/Sovereign Sentinel|(contribs)]]</span> 07:27, 3 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
::* {{re|Sovereign Sentinel}} Could you elaborate on the "neutrality concerns?" The hook presents the positions of both sides in a balanced manner, and is basically a paraphrase of the lead of [http://www.wsj.com/articles/chinese-general-abe-hagel-speeches-provocative-toward-china-1401590684 this WSJ article]. How is it non-neutral? As for interestingness, this trade of barbs was interesting enough to make headlines worldwide last year, just search Google news. -[[User:Zanhe|Zanhe]] ([[User talk:Zanhe|talk]]) 19:57, 3 September 2015 (UTC) | ::* {{re|Sovereign Sentinel}} Could you elaborate on the "neutrality concerns?" The hook presents the positions of both sides in a balanced manner, and is basically a paraphrase of the lead of [http://www.wsj.com/articles/chinese-general-abe-hagel-speeches-provocative-toward-china-1401590684 this WSJ article]. How is it non-neutral? As for interestingness, this trade of barbs was interesting enough to make headlines worldwide last year, just search Google news. -[[User:Zanhe|Zanhe]] ([[User talk:Zanhe|talk]]) 19:57, 3 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Sorry, I got mixed up while reviewing... Otherwise the article is long enough, new enough, and adequately sourced. Apologies for the inconvenience <span style="color:black">[[User:Sovereign Sentinel|sovereign]]°[[User talk:Sovereign Sentinel|sentinel]] [[Special:Contributions/Sovereign Sentinel|(contribs)]]</span> 23:00, 3 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 23:00, 3 September 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Wang Guanzhong
- ... that at the 2014 Shangri-La Dialogue, Chinese general Wang Guanzhong accused Shinzo Abe and Chuck Hagel of provocation, in response to their criticism of China's actions in the South China Sea?
- Reviewed: Province of Pavia
Created by Zanhe (talk). Self-nominated at 00:11, 23 August 2015 (UTC).
Hook is uninteresting and has neutrality concerns. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 07:27, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Re Could you elaborate on the "neutrality concerns?" The hook presents the positions of both sides in a balanced manner, and is basically a paraphrase of the lead of this WSJ article. How is it non-neutral? As for interestingness, this trade of barbs was interesting enough to make headlines worldwide last year, just search Google news. -Zanhe (talk) 19:57, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, I got mixed up while reviewing... Otherwise the article is long enough, new enough, and adequately sourced. Apologies for the inconvenience sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 23:00, 3 September 2015 (UTC)