Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Wasp Branch"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>EEng
(GTG)
imported>Jakec
(rp)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
:::''A 1973 survey discovered no members of the Pteronarcyidae species Pteronarcys biloba on Wasp Branch.''
 
:::''A 1973 survey discovered no members of the Pteronarcyidae species Pteronarcys biloba on Wasp Branch.''
 
::If these were wasps, I'd understand. But they're not. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 03:56, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
 
::If these were wasps, I'd understand. But they're not. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 03:56, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
 
+
:::I happened to notice it while doing a Google search and figured it couldn't hurt to throw it in. --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' 00:53, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 00:53, 30 December 2014

Wasp Branch

  • ... that Wasp Branch is designated as a Coldwater Fishery, Migratory Fishery and Class A Wild Trout Waters and is used as a High-Quality Coldwater Fishery and a Migratory Fishery?

Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self nominated at 21:15, 21 December 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Another easy GTG. I do have a question, though. What is the significance of saying that
A 1973 survey discovered no members of the Pteronarcyidae species Pteronarcys biloba on Wasp Branch.
If these were wasps, I'd understand. But they're not. EEng (talk) 03:56, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
I happened to notice it while doing a Google search and figured it couldn't hurt to throw it in. --Jakob (talk) 00:53, 30 December 2014 (UTC)