Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Watch n' Learn"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr |
imported>Tomica (some mods) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Hook is supported by text of article which is supported by a fact in the article but I think it is a little ambiguous and the hook is not clear. What the hook actually means is: "A review of [[Rihanna]]'s "'''[[Watch n' Learn]]'''" compared it to [[Beyoncé Knowles]]' 2011 song "[[Party (song)|Party]]", which is different than what my interpretation as a a reader would be of the songs being connected beyond a review. Can an Alt hook be proposed? --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 04:28, 22 April 2012 (UTC) | * [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Hook is supported by text of article which is supported by a fact in the article but I think it is a little ambiguous and the hook is not clear. What the hook actually means is: "A review of [[Rihanna]]'s "'''[[Watch n' Learn]]'''" compared it to [[Beyoncé Knowles]]' 2011 song "[[Party (song)|Party]]", which is different than what my interpretation as a a reader would be of the songs being connected beyond a review. Can an Alt hook be proposed? --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 04:28, 22 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | {{*mp}} Alt1: ...according to one reviewer, the [[Reggae music|reggae]] [[Fill (music)|drum fill]] in "'''[[Watch n' Learn]]'''" originates from [[Bob Marley]]'s 1983 single "[[Buffalo Soldier (song)|Buffalo Soldier]]"? — [[User:1111tomica|<span style="text-shadow:#BBBBBB 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml"><font color="darkgreen">'''Tomica'''</font >]] [[User talk:1111tomica|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font ></span>]] 22:33, 22 April 2012 (UTC) | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] '''Alt1''' should be good to go. It should be properly formatted in version above (thought please check?) and is interesting enough and supported by inline citation. --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 21:32, 22 April 2012 (UTC) | [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] '''Alt1''' should be good to go. It should be properly formatted in version above (thought please check?) and is interesting enough and supported by inline citation. --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 21:32, 22 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 22:33, 22 April 2012
Watch n' Learn
- ... that Rihanna's "Watch n' Learn" was linked to Beyoncé Knowles' 2011 song "Party"?
Created/expanded by 1111tomica (talk). Self nom at 17:26, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
New enough and long enough at the time of nomination. Article is completely supported by inline citations. Plagiarism check here, here, here, here. No problems identified. I've read it three times. I feel like it reads as a bit promotional at time, but I'm not certain how this can be avoided if the critical reception has been positive and there wasn't much drama in creating the song. all images have an acceptable copyright tag or fair use rationale. Hook I think is properly formatted.
Hook is supported by text of article which is supported by a fact in the article but I think it is a little ambiguous and the hook is not clear. What the hook actually means is: "A review of Rihanna's "Watch n' Learn" compared it to Beyoncé Knowles' 2011 song "Party", which is different than what my interpretation as a a reader would be of the songs being connected beyond a review. Can an Alt hook be proposed? --LauraHale (talk) 04:28, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
- Alt1: ...according to one reviewer, the reggae drum fill in "Watch n' Learn" originates from Bob Marley's 1983 single "Buffalo Soldier"? — Tomica (talk) 22:33, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Alt1 should be good to go. It should be properly formatted in version above (thought please check?) and is interesting enough and supported by inline citation. --LauraHale (talk) 21:32, 22 April 2012 (UTC)