Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Watch n' Learn"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Tomica
(some mods)
imported>Crisco 1492
(to prep 4)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from March 2012]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=March 2012
+
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.  '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 14:40, 23 April 2012 (UTC)<br />}}
 
====Watch n' Learn====
 
====Watch n' Learn====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Watch n&#39; Learn|Watch n' Learn}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Watch n&#39; Learn|Watch n' Learn}}
<!-- 
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
{{*mp}}... that [[Rihanna]]'s "'''[[Watch n' Learn]]'''" was linked to [[Beyoncé Knowles]]' 2011 song "[[Party (song)|Party]]"?
 
{{*mp}}... that [[Rihanna]]'s "'''[[Watch n' Learn]]'''" was linked to [[Beyoncé Knowles]]' 2011 song "[[Party (song)|Party]]"?
<!--
 
-->
 
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:1111tomica|1111tomica]] ([[User talk:1111tomica|talk]]).  Self nom at 17:26, 29 March 2012 (UTC)</small>
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:1111tomica|1111tomica]] ([[User talk:1111tomica|talk]]).  Self nom at 17:26, 29 March 2012 (UTC)</small>
<!--
 
*{{DYKmake|Watch n' Learn|1111tomica|subpage=Watch n&#39; Learn}}
 
-->
 
  
:*<!--Make first comment here-->
+
:*
 
* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New enough and long enough at the time of nomination.  Article is completely supported by inline citations.  Plagiarism check [http://toolserver.org/~dcoetzee/duplicationdetector/compare.php?url1=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FWatch_n%2527_Learn&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mtv.com%2Fnews%2Farticles%2F1674237%2Frihanna-talk-that-talk-watch-learn-hit-boy.jhtml&minwords=2&minchars=13 here], [http://toolserver.org/~dcoetzee/duplicationdetector/compare.php?url1=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FWatch_n%2527_Learn&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fbuzzworthy.mtv.com%2F2011%2F11%2F21%2Frihanna-talk-that-talk%2F&minwords=2&minchars=13 here], [http://toolserver.org/~dcoetzee/duplicationdetector/compare.php?url1=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FWatch_n%2527_Learn&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.allmusic.com%2Falbum%2Ftalk-that-talk-r2318208%2Freview&minwords=2&minchars=13 here], [http://toolserver.org/~dcoetzee/duplicationdetector/compare.php?url1=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FWatch_n%2527_Learn&url2=http%3A%2F%2Flatimesblogs.latimes.com%2Fmusic_blog%2F2011%2F11%2Falbum-review-rihanna-s-talk-that-talk.html&minwords=2&minchars=13 here].  No problems identified.  I've read it three times.  I feel like it reads as a bit promotional at time, but I'm not certain how this can be avoided if the critical reception has been positive and there wasn't much drama in creating the song. all images have an acceptable copyright tag or fair use rationale.  Hook I think is properly formatted.
 
* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New enough and long enough at the time of nomination.  Article is completely supported by inline citations.  Plagiarism check [http://toolserver.org/~dcoetzee/duplicationdetector/compare.php?url1=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FWatch_n%2527_Learn&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mtv.com%2Fnews%2Farticles%2F1674237%2Frihanna-talk-that-talk-watch-learn-hit-boy.jhtml&minwords=2&minchars=13 here], [http://toolserver.org/~dcoetzee/duplicationdetector/compare.php?url1=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FWatch_n%2527_Learn&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fbuzzworthy.mtv.com%2F2011%2F11%2F21%2Frihanna-talk-that-talk%2F&minwords=2&minchars=13 here], [http://toolserver.org/~dcoetzee/duplicationdetector/compare.php?url1=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FWatch_n%2527_Learn&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.allmusic.com%2Falbum%2Ftalk-that-talk-r2318208%2Freview&minwords=2&minchars=13 here], [http://toolserver.org/~dcoetzee/duplicationdetector/compare.php?url1=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FWatch_n%2527_Learn&url2=http%3A%2F%2Flatimesblogs.latimes.com%2Fmusic_blog%2F2011%2F11%2Falbum-review-rihanna-s-talk-that-talk.html&minwords=2&minchars=13 here].  No problems identified.  I've read it three times.  I feel like it reads as a bit promotional at time, but I'm not certain how this can be avoided if the critical reception has been positive and there wasn't much drama in creating the song. all images have an acceptable copyright tag or fair use rationale.  Hook I think is properly formatted.
 
* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Hook is supported by text of article which is supported by a fact in the article but I think it is a little ambiguous and the hook is not clear.  What the hook actually means is: "A review of [[Rihanna]]'s "'''[[Watch n' Learn]]'''" compared it to [[Beyoncé Knowles]]' 2011 song "[[Party (song)|Party]]", which is different than what my interpretation as a a reader would be of the songs being connected beyond a review.  Can an Alt hook be proposed? --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 04:28, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 
* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Hook is supported by text of article which is supported by a fact in the article but I think it is a little ambiguous and the hook is not clear.  What the hook actually means is: "A review of [[Rihanna]]'s "'''[[Watch n' Learn]]'''" compared it to [[Beyoncé Knowles]]' 2011 song "[[Party (song)|Party]]", which is different than what my interpretation as a a reader would be of the songs being connected beyond a review.  Can an Alt hook be proposed? --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 04:28, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Line 24: Line 14:
 
{{*mp}} Alt1: ...according to one reviewer, the [[Reggae music|reggae]] [[Fill (music)|drum fill]] in "'''[[Watch n' Learn]]'''" originates from [[Bob Marley]]'s 1983 single "[[Buffalo Soldier (song)|Buffalo Soldier]]"? — [[User:1111tomica|<span style="text-shadow:#BBBBBB 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml"><font color="darkgreen">'''Tomica'''</font >]] [[User talk:1111tomica|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font ></span>]] 22:33, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 
{{*mp}} Alt1: ...according to one reviewer, the [[Reggae music|reggae]] [[Fill (music)|drum fill]] in "'''[[Watch n' Learn]]'''" originates from [[Bob Marley]]'s 1983 single "[[Buffalo Soldier (song)|Buffalo Soldier]]"? — [[User:1111tomica|<span style="text-shadow:#BBBBBB 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml"><font color="darkgreen">'''Tomica'''</font >]] [[User talk:1111tomica|<font color="darkgreen">(talk)</font ></span>]] 22:33, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
  
[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]]  '''Alt1''' should be good to go.  It should be properly formatted in version above (thought please check?) and is interesting enough and supported by inline citation. --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 21:32, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
+
:[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]]  '''Alt1''' should be good to go.  It should be properly formatted in version above (thought please check?) and is interesting enough and supported by inline citation. --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 21:32, 22 April 2012 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Revision as of 14:40, 23 April 2012

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:40, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Watch n' Learn

Created/expanded by 1111tomica (talk). Self nom at 17:26, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

  • Symbol confirmed.svg New enough and long enough at the time of nomination. Article is completely supported by inline citations. Plagiarism check here, here, here, here. No problems identified. I've read it three times. I feel like it reads as a bit promotional at time, but I'm not certain how this can be avoided if the critical reception has been positive and there wasn't much drama in creating the song. all images have an acceptable copyright tag or fair use rationale. Hook I think is properly formatted.
  • Symbol question.svg Hook is supported by text of article which is supported by a fact in the article but I think it is a little ambiguous and the hook is not clear. What the hook actually means is: "A review of Rihanna's "Watch n' Learn" compared it to Beyoncé Knowles' 2011 song "Party", which is different than what my interpretation as a a reader would be of the songs being connected beyond a review. Can an Alt hook be proposed? --LauraHale (talk) 04:28, 22 April 2012 (UTC)


Symbol confirmed.svg Alt1 should be good to go. It should be properly formatted in version above (thought please check?) and is interesting enough and supported by inline citation. --LauraHale (talk) 21:32, 22 April 2012 (UTC)