Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Webster Sycamore"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>The Almightey Drill |
imported>West Virginian m (Response) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
::::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Image is acceptable as copyright has expired. It is used in the article and clearly visible when scaled down [[User:The Almightey Drill|'''tAD''']] ([[User talk:The Almightey Drill|talk]]) 13:08, 8 October 2015 (UTC) | ::::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Image is acceptable as copyright has expired. It is used in the article and clearly visible when scaled down [[User:The Almightey Drill|'''tAD''']] ([[User talk:The Almightey Drill|talk]]) 13:08, 8 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
::::{{u|West Virginian}}: We must now ask whether it is fair use to include the 1955 image, as what is shown in the image and what it is illustrating is practically the same as the non-copyrighted 1920 image [[User:The Almightey Drill|'''tAD''']] ([[User talk:The Almightey Drill|talk]]) 13:10, 8 October 2015 (UTC) | ::::{{u|West Virginian}}: We must now ask whether it is fair use to include the 1955 image, as what is shown in the image and what it is illustrating is practically the same as the non-copyrighted 1920 image [[User:The Almightey Drill|'''tAD''']] ([[User talk:The Almightey Drill|talk]]) 13:10, 8 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
| − | :::::{{u|The Almightey Drill}}, because the 1950s image is of better quality and illustrates the scale of the tree with the four men, do you think that would serve as enough rationale to keep it? I have modified the "Purpose of use in article" and "Not replaceable with | + | :::::{{u|The Almightey Drill}}, because the 1950s image is of better quality and illustrates the scale of the tree with the four men, do you think that would serve as enough rationale to keep it? I have modified the "Purpose of use in article" and "Not replaceable with free media because" accordingly. I'm not opposed to disposing with it though. Thank you tremendously for your approval and re-review. -- [[User:West Virginian|<span style="font-weight:bold;font-style:MS Sans Serif;color:#2E5894">West Virginian </span>]] [[User talk:West Virginian|<span style="font-style:MS Sans Serif;color:#CFB53B">''(talk)''</span>]] 14:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC) |
| − | free media because" accordingly. I'm not opposed to disposing with it though. Thank you tremendously for your approval and re-review. -- [[User:West Virginian|<span style="font-weight:bold;font-style:MS Sans Serif;color:#2E5894">West Virginian </span>]] [[User talk:West Virginian|<span style="font-style:MS Sans Serif;color:#CFB53B">''(talk)''</span>]] 14:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
::::::{{u|West Virginian}}: I would say that to illustrate the size compared to men is an acceptable rationale as the purpose is clearly educational. As the thumbnail is small (and monochrome), it may be helpful to mention the men and the relevance of them to the size, in the caption. That's my idea, you may think in a different/better way [[User:The Almightey Drill|'''tAD''']] ([[User talk:The Almightey Drill|talk]]) 14:04, 8 October 2015 (UTC) | ::::::{{u|West Virginian}}: I would say that to illustrate the size compared to men is an acceptable rationale as the purpose is clearly educational. As the thumbnail is small (and monochrome), it may be helpful to mention the men and the relevance of them to the size, in the caption. That's my idea, you may think in a different/better way [[User:The Almightey Drill|'''tAD''']] ([[User talk:The Almightey Drill|talk]]) 14:04, 8 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::::::{{u|The Almightey Drill}}: Thank you for the suggestion; I've modified the image's caption in the article accordingly. Your guidance and suggestions are always greatly appreciated. -- [[User:West Virginian|<span style="font-weight:bold;font-style:MS Sans Serif;color:#2E5894">West Virginian </span>]] [[User talk:West Virginian|<span style="font-style:MS Sans Serif;color:#CFB53B">''(talk)''</span>]] 14:08, 8 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 14:08, 8 October 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Webster Sycamore
- ... that West Virginia's largest American sycamore, the Webster Sycamore, survived an arson attack and inspired a proposed name for the state's health insurance marketplace?
- Reviewed: Orit Adato
- Comment: As always, I am open to suggested alternatives for the hook. -- West Virginian (talk) 16:19, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Moved to mainspace by West Virginian (talk). Self-nominated at 16:19, 6 October 2015 (UTC).
New enough (on account of move to mainspace) and definitely long enough. Sourced throughout, including the interesting hooks. No sign of copyvio or issues with the hook or content. QPQ done '''tAD''' (talk) 17:53, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you Template:U! Your review is greatly appreciated. -- West Virginian (talk) 18:22, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
- Template:U, I was able to secure a Public Domain image of the Webster Sycamore with the assistance of Template:U. Would you be able to review this image and re-certify this DYK nomination as you see fit? Thank you. -- West Virginian (talk) 12:33, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Image is acceptable as copyright has expired. It is used in the article and clearly visible when scaled down '''tAD''' (talk) 13:08, 8 October 2015 (UTC)- Template:U: We must now ask whether it is fair use to include the 1955 image, as what is shown in the image and what it is illustrating is practically the same as the non-copyrighted 1920 image '''tAD''' (talk) 13:10, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Template:U, because the 1950s image is of better quality and illustrates the scale of the tree with the four men, do you think that would serve as enough rationale to keep it? I have modified the "Purpose of use in article" and "Not replaceable with free media because" accordingly. I'm not opposed to disposing with it though. Thank you tremendously for your approval and re-review. -- West Virginian (talk) 14:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Template:U: I would say that to illustrate the size compared to men is an acceptable rationale as the purpose is clearly educational. As the thumbnail is small (and monochrome), it may be helpful to mention the men and the relevance of them to the size, in the caption. That's my idea, you may think in a different/better way '''tAD''' (talk) 14:04, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Template:U: Thank you for the suggestion; I've modified the image's caption in the article accordingly. Your guidance and suggestions are always greatly appreciated. -- West Virginian (talk) 14:08, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Template:U: I would say that to illustrate the size compared to men is an acceptable rationale as the purpose is clearly educational. As the thumbnail is small (and monochrome), it may be helpful to mention the men and the relevance of them to the size, in the caption. That's my idea, you may think in a different/better way '''tAD''' (talk) 14:04, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Template:U, because the 1950s image is of better quality and illustrates the scale of the tree with the four men, do you think that would serve as enough rationale to keep it? I have modified the "Purpose of use in article" and "Not replaceable with free media because" accordingly. I'm not opposed to disposing with it though. Thank you tremendously for your approval and re-review. -- West Virginian (talk) 14:00, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
