Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Winton Square"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Tom Morris (reviewing: good to go) |
imported>Hawkeye7 (Passed - moved to prep area 1) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from October 2014]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
| − | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Hawkeye7|Hawkeye7]] ([[User talk:Hawkeye7|talk]]) 02:44, 11 October 2014 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Winton Square==== | ====Winton Square==== | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;"> | <div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;"> | ||
[[File:Stoke-PB160864.JPG|100x100px|Stoke-on-Trent station on the south side of Winton Square]] | [[File:Stoke-PB160864.JPG|100x100px|Stoke-on-Trent station on the south side of Winton Square]] | ||
| − | </div | + | </div> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that '''[[Winton Square]]''' ''(pictured)'' in [[Stoke-on-Trent]] is described as the best example of [[Jacobethan|neo-Jacobean architecture]] in Staffordshire? | * ... that '''[[Winton Square]]''' ''(pictured)'' in [[Stoke-on-Trent]] is described as the best example of [[Jacobethan|neo-Jacobean architecture]] in Staffordshire? | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Jovan Albanez]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Jovan Albanez]] | ||
<small>Created by [[User:HJ Mitchell|HJ Mitchell]] ([[User talk:HJ Mitchell|talk]]). Self nominated at 15:15, 9 October 2014 (UTC)</small>. | <small>Created by [[User:HJ Mitchell|HJ Mitchell]] ([[User talk:HJ Mitchell|talk]]). Self nominated at 15:15, 9 October 2014 (UTC)</small>. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] I couldn't check the Biddle source, but the rest of the sources checked out including the source used for the hook. Article looks fine and within policy as far as I can see. Hook is under 200 characters, looks good to go. —[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris|talk]]) 20:51, 9 October 2014 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] I couldn't check the Biddle source, but the rest of the sources checked out including the source used for the hook. Article looks fine and within policy as far as I can see. Hook is under 200 characters, looks good to go. —[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris|talk]]) 20:51, 9 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| − | {{-}} | + | {{-}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 02:44, 11 October 2014
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:44, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Winton Square
- ... that Winton Square (pictured) in Stoke-on-Trent is described as the best example of neo-Jacobean architecture in Staffordshire?
Created by HJ Mitchell (talk). Self nominated at 15:15, 9 October 2014 (UTC).
I couldn't check the Biddle source, but the rest of the sources checked out including the source used for the hook. Article looks fine and within policy as far as I can see. Hook is under 200 characters, looks good to go. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:51, 9 October 2014 (UTC)