Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Wojciech Sadurski"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>CeeGee
(reviewed)
imported>Piotrus
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article is new, neutral and long enough. It cites sources inline. "Earwig's Copyvio Detector" reports moderate text similarities, which result mostly from quotes. All hooks are well-formatted. I prefer ALT2. It is interesting. Its length is within limit, and its fact is sourced inline. QPQ was done. Good to go. [[User talk:CeeGee|CeeGee]] 12:56, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article is new, neutral and long enough. It cites sources inline. "Earwig's Copyvio Detector" reports moderate text similarities, which result mostly from quotes. All hooks are well-formatted. I prefer ALT2. It is interesting. Its length is within limit, and its fact is sourced inline. QPQ was done. Good to go. [[User talk:CeeGee|CeeGee]] 12:56, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 +
:*'''Comment''' and ping [[User:CeeGee]], [[User:Buidhe]]. I worry that this article is much less neutral than the corresponding Polish article. On pl wiki, his biography doesn't even have a section about 'criticism', and is structured in the usual form (education, work, etc.). But our biography seems significanty focused on his recent criticism of the government. I think this is not 'best practices' as far as [[WP:BLP]] and [[WP:UNDUE]] go. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]&#124;[[User talk:Piotrus|<span style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</span>]]</sub> 04:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 
   
 
   
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 04:16, 21 October 2020

Wojciech Sadurski

  • ... that according to law scholar Wojciech Sadurski, Poland is undergoing a "constitutional breakdown"? Source: Sadurski, Wojciech (2019). Poland's Constitutional Breakdown. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-884050-3.

Created by Buidhe (talk). Self-nominated at 23:53, 18 October 2020 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Article is new, neutral and long enough. It cites sources inline. "Earwig's Copyvio Detector" reports moderate text similarities, which result mostly from quotes. All hooks are well-formatted. I prefer ALT2. It is interesting. Its length is within limit, and its fact is sourced inline. QPQ was done. Good to go. CeeGee 12:56, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Comment and ping User:CeeGee, User:Buidhe. I worry that this article is much less neutral than the corresponding Polish article. On pl wiki, his biography doesn't even have a section about 'criticism', and is structured in the usual form (education, work, etc.). But our biography seems significanty focused on his recent criticism of the government. I think this is not 'best practices' as far as WP:BLP and WP:UNDUE go. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)