Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Wolfram Röhrig"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Usernameunique (Good to go) |
imported>Gerda Arendt (soft grumble, but accept) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
::* Sigh, and see [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical music/Archive 70|the discussion on classical music]]. How about: "including jazz". The department was called "Leichte Musik" in the 1950s, which translates to [[Light music]], but that article describes something very British and different. The broadcaster had jazz as a sub-department of it, which feels strange, at least today, at least to me. Compare [[Hans Otto Jung]], "Swing Under the Nazis: Jazz as a Metaphor for Freedom". --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 08:29, 12 December 2017 (UTC) | ::* Sigh, and see [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical music/Archive 70|the discussion on classical music]]. How about: "including jazz". The department was called "Leichte Musik" in the 1950s, which translates to [[Light music]], but that article describes something very British and different. The broadcaster had jazz as a sub-department of it, which feels strange, at least today, at least to me. Compare [[Hans Otto Jung]], "Swing Under the Nazis: Jazz as a Metaphor for Freedom". --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 08:29, 12 December 2017 (UTC) | ||
:::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Works for me. Changed to "such as jazz" to avoid adding another clause into the sentence. --[[User:Usernameunique|Usernameunique]] ([[User talk:Usernameunique|talk]]) 09:18, 12 December 2017 (UTC) | :::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Works for me. Changed to "such as jazz" to avoid adding another clause into the sentence. --[[User:Usernameunique|Usernameunique]] ([[User talk:Usernameunique|talk]]) 09:18, 12 December 2017 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::* I tried to explain why I don't believe in jazz being entertaining (only). Could we say "entertaining music", in quotation marks I mean, indicating that it is the translation of a name rather that a description of music? Could we please not change nominated hooks when the very thing discussed here is now no more there? - Well, I could also let it go as is ;) --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 09:36, 12 December 2017 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 09:37, 12 December 2017
DYK toolbox |
---|
Wolfram Röhrig
- ... that Wolfram Röhrig, who was responsible for entertaining music such as jazz for the broadcaster Süddeutscher Rundfunk, recorded Max Reger's Der 100. Psalm? Source: several
- Reviewed: Remote sensing (geology)
Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 13:37, 25 November 2017 (UTC).
New, in time, long enough, sourced, neutral, inline hook citations check out, QPQ done. Template:U, how about "entertaining jazz music" rather than "entertaining music and jazz"? Since jazz is a type of music, it feels redundant. --Usernameunique (talk) 05:30, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- Sigh, and see the discussion on classical music. How about: "including jazz". The department was called "Leichte Musik" in the 1950s, which translates to Light music, but that article describes something very British and different. The broadcaster had jazz as a sub-department of it, which feels strange, at least today, at least to me. Compare Hans Otto Jung, "Swing Under the Nazis: Jazz as a Metaphor for Freedom". --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:29, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Works for me. Changed to "such as jazz" to avoid adding another clause into the sentence. --Usernameunique (talk) 09:18, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- I tried to explain why I don't believe in jazz being entertaining (only). Could we say "entertaining music", in quotation marks I mean, indicating that it is the translation of a name rather that a description of music? Could we please not change nominated hooks when the very thing discussed here is now no more there? - Well, I could also let it go as is ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:36, 12 December 2017 (UTC)