Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Yonne"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Cwmhiraeth
 
imported>Biruitorul
(tick)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*  -->
+
:*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]]
 
+
:*The article is newly expanded.
 +
:*The article has not previously featured on the Main Page.
 +
:*The article is long enough.
 +
:*Citations are sufficient and drawn from reliable published sources.
 +
:*No disputes surround the article.
 +
:*I see nothing that might be construed as a BLP violation.
 +
:*I can find no particular issues with plagiarism. I assume the wording is original.
 +
:*I see no neutrality issues, either. This is a straightforward account.
 +
:*The article is not up for AfD.
 +
:*I assume good faith as to the hook. I do have to note that there is much to dislike in the article as it stands: "from [[Socialist Party (France)]]" should be "from the [[Socialist Party (France)|Socialist Party]]", while the author really should decide on a valid citation format. "J. Robinson (ed) ''"The Oxford Companion to Wine"'' Third Edition pg 148–149 Oxford University Press 2006 ISBN 0-19-860990-6" is gibberish; if you are to use "cite book", at least use it consistently; ergo, {{cite book|editor=Robinson, J. |title= The Oxford Companion to Wine |year=2006|publisher= Oxford University Press |isbn=0-19-860990-6 |page=148-49}} But yes, the hook does pass, as far as that's concerned. - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 23:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 23:22, 9 October 2015

Yonne

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 05:40, 25 September 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol voting keep.svg
  • The article is newly expanded.
  • The article has not previously featured on the Main Page.
  • The article is long enough.
  • Citations are sufficient and drawn from reliable published sources.
  • No disputes surround the article.
  • I see nothing that might be construed as a BLP violation.
  • I can find no particular issues with plagiarism. I assume the wording is original.
  • I see no neutrality issues, either. This is a straightforward account.
  • The article is not up for AfD.
  • I assume good faith as to the hook. I do have to note that there is much to dislike in the article as it stands: "from Socialist Party (France)" should be "from the Socialist Party", while the author really should decide on a valid citation format. "J. Robinson (ed) "The Oxford Companion to Wine" Third Edition pg 148–149 Oxford University Press 2006 ISBN 0-19-860990-6" is gibberish; if you are to use "cite book", at least use it consistently; ergo, Robinson, J., ed. (2006). The Oxford Companion to Wine. Oxford University Press. p. 148-49. ISBN 0-19-860990-6. But yes, the hook does pass, as far as that's concerned. - Biruitorul Talk 23:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)