Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/ZTE Orbit"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Philafrenzy (CE) |
imported>Mifter Public (Cmt) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Article is new enough and long enough. Not a stub. Neutral and well referenced. AGF on the fine technical detail. Why is the website shown as Samsung? Hook is correctly formatted with an inline cite in the article. No copyvios or close paraphrasing noted. Removed "device" from hook. [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) 09:35, 14 February 2017 (UTC) | :[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Article is new enough and long enough. Not a stub. Neutral and well referenced. AGF on the fine technical detail. Why is the website shown as Samsung? Hook is correctly formatted with an inline cite in the article. No copyvios or close paraphrasing noted. Removed "device" from hook. [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) 09:35, 14 February 2017 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::{{ping|Philafrenzy}} - thanks for catching that. I was working on two draft phone articles at the same and in reusing part of the infobox format I missed the wrong link being included (I just verified that everything else was changed to reflect this phone as it should have been). [[User:Mifter Public|Mifter Public]] ([[User talk:Mifter Public|talk]]) 16:18, 14 February 2017 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 16:18, 14 February 2017
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
ZTE Orbit
- ... that the ZTE Orbit was the first Windows Phone to include near field communication (NFC)? Source: The various refs mention it in a number of ways with some merely alluding to it, but this link is perhaps the clearest single source.
- Reviewed: St. Marien am Behnitz
Created by Mifter (talk). Self-nominated at 04:54, 11 February 2017 (UTC).
Article is new enough and long enough. Not a stub. Neutral and well referenced. AGF on the fine technical detail. Why is the website shown as Samsung? Hook is correctly formatted with an inline cite in the article. No copyvios or close paraphrasing noted. Removed "device" from hook. Philafrenzy (talk) 09:35, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Ping - thanks for catching that. I was working on two draft phone articles at the same and in reusing part of the infobox format I missed the wrong link being included (I just verified that everything else was changed to reflect this phone as it should have been). Mifter Public (talk) 16:18, 14 February 2017 (UTC)