Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/climate sensitivity"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Yoninah
(strikethrough)
imported>Evrik
Line 7: Line 7:
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=climate sensitivity|Climate sensitivity}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=climate sensitivity|Climate sensitivity}}
 
<!--
 
<!--
 
 
                   Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
                   Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
-->
 
* ... that if '''[[climate sensitivity]]''' is on the high side of what scientists estimate, it may be impossible to achieve the [[Paris Agreement]] goal of limiting [[global warming]] to below {{Convert|2.0|°C-change}}? <small>Source:  https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-018-0097-x: ''However, remaining below these temperature targets without temporarily exceeding them (overshooting) is only possible under limited conditions. If climate sensitivity is above 3.4 °C (the 2 °C target case) or 2.2 °C (the 1.5 °C target case), the targets are not achievable (with all other model assumptions intact) because emissions cannot be reduced fast enough to sufficiently limit rising temperatures.''</small>
 
* ... that if '''[[climate sensitivity]]''' is on the high side of what scientists estimate, it may be impossible to achieve the [[Paris Agreement]] goal of limiting [[global warming]] to below {{Convert|2.0|°C-change}}? <small>Source:  https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-018-0097-x: ''However, remaining below these temperature targets without temporarily exceeding them (overshooting) is only possible under limited conditions. If climate sensitivity is above 3.4 °C (the 2 °C target case) or 2.2 °C (the 1.5 °C target case), the targets are not achievable (with all other model assumptions intact) because emissions cannot be reduced fast enough to sufficiently limit rising temperatures.''</small>
Line 18: Line 16:
 
* {{DYKmake|Climate sensitivity|Femkemilene}}
 
* {{DYKmake|Climate sensitivity|Femkemilene}}
 
-->
 
-->
 
+
:*reviewed:QPQ missing
 
:* Article being actively worked on; see [[Talk:Climate sensitivity|talk page]]. [[User:HLHJ|HLHJ]] ([[User talk:HLHJ|talk]]) 04:03, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 
:* Article being actively worked on; see [[Talk:Climate sensitivity|talk page]]. [[User:HLHJ|HLHJ]] ([[User talk:HLHJ|talk]]) 04:03, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 
::* And article work is now finished (other round of copy-edit + removal of jargon). [[User:Femkemilene|Femke Nijsse]] ([[User talk:Femkemilene|talk]]) 09:36, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
 
::* And article work is now finished (other round of copy-edit + removal of jargon). [[User:Femkemilene|Femke Nijsse]] ([[User talk:Femkemilene|talk]]) 09:36, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Line 24: Line 22:
 
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Full review needed now that the article work has been completed. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 16:22, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Full review needed now that the article work has been completed. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 16:22, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 
:*Striking hook with too many "climates" in it. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 00:01, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 
:*Striking hook with too many "climates" in it. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 00:01, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 +
*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] As a new GA, it's is long enough, it is well sourced. At the time of its nomination it was new enough. I am okay with the hook. There is no QPQ. --[[User:evrik|evrik]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:evrik|talk]])</sup> 22:47, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 22:47, 5 April 2020

Climate sensitivity

Improved to Good Article status by Femkemilene (talk). Self-nominated at 17:28, 16 February 2020 (UTC).

  • reviewed:QPQ missing
  • Article being actively worked on; see talk page. HLHJ (talk) 04:03, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
  • And article work is now finished (other round of copy-edit + removal of jargon). Femke Nijsse (talk) 09:36, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
  • 16px Full review needed now that the article work has been completed. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:22, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Striking hook with too many "climates" in it. Yoninah (talk) 00:01, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
  • 16px As a new GA, it's is long enough, it is well sourced. At the time of its nomination it was new enough. I am okay with the hook. There is no QPQ. --evrik (talk) 22:47, 5 April 2020 (UTC)