Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/climate sensitivity"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Femkemilene
(QPQ only needed from 5th DYK, right?)
imported>Evrik
Line 16: Line 16:
 
* {{DYKmake|Climate sensitivity|Femkemilene}}
 
* {{DYKmake|Climate sensitivity|Femkemilene}}
 
-->
 
-->
:*reviewed:QPQ missing
+
:*reviewed:Not needed
 
:* Article being actively worked on; see [[Talk:Climate sensitivity|talk page]]. [[User:HLHJ|HLHJ]] ([[User talk:HLHJ|talk]]) 04:03, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 
:* Article being actively worked on; see [[Talk:Climate sensitivity|talk page]]. [[User:HLHJ|HLHJ]] ([[User talk:HLHJ|talk]]) 04:03, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 
::* And article work is now finished (other round of copy-edit + removal of jargon). [[User:Femkemilene|Femke Nijsse]] ([[User talk:Femkemilene|talk]]) 09:36, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
 
::* And article work is now finished (other round of copy-edit + removal of jargon). [[User:Femkemilene|Femke Nijsse]] ([[User talk:Femkemilene|talk]]) 09:36, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Line 24: Line 24:
 
*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] As a new GA, it's is long enough, it is well sourced. At the time of its nomination it was new enough. I am okay with the hook. There is no QPQ. --[[User:evrik|evrik]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:evrik|talk]])</sup> 22:47, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 
*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] As a new GA, it's is long enough, it is well sourced. At the time of its nomination it was new enough. I am okay with the hook. There is no QPQ. --[[User:evrik|evrik]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:evrik|talk]])</sup> 22:47, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 
:: As this is my second DYK, I don't need a QPQ yet, I don't think. [[User:Femkemilene|Femke Nijsse]] ([[User talk:Femkemilene|talk]]) 07:06, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 
:: As this is my second DYK, I don't need a QPQ yet, I don't think. [[User:Femkemilene|Femke Nijsse]] ([[User talk:Femkemilene|talk]]) 07:06, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 +
*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] --[[User:evrik|evrik]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:evrik|talk]])</sup> 11:44, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 11:44, 6 April 2020

Climate sensitivity

Improved to Good Article status by Femkemilene (talk). Self-nominated at 17:28, 16 February 2020 (UTC).

  • reviewed:Not needed
  • Article being actively worked on; see talk page. HLHJ (talk) 04:03, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
  • And article work is now finished (other round of copy-edit + removal of jargon). Femke Nijsse (talk) 09:36, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
  • 16px Full review needed now that the article work has been completed. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:22, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Striking hook with too many "climates" in it. Yoninah (talk) 00:01, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
  • 16px As a new GA, it's is long enough, it is well sourced. At the time of its nomination it was new enough. I am okay with the hook. There is no QPQ. --evrik (talk) 22:47, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
As this is my second DYK, I don't need a QPQ yet, I don't think. Femke Nijsse (talk) 07:06, 6 April 2020 (UTC)