Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/hak(k)a = circular forts"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Couiros22
imported>BlueMoonset
(closing completely ineligible nomination)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>[[Category:Failed DYK nominations&nbsp;from December 2019]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=December 2019  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes, no, or withdrawn -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''rejected''' by [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 17:57, 12 December 2019 (UTC)<br />
 +
Nominator has not created, expanded, or even edited the four bold-linked articles; none of them are remotely eligible for DYK.
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK header|Hakka people, tulou}}
 
{{DYK header|Hakka people, tulou}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=hak(k)a = circular forts|Hakka people|tulou}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=hak(k)a = circular forts|Hakka people|tulou}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that the '''[[Hakka people]]''' of [[southern China]] and the '''[[Māori people|haka warriors]]''' of [[New Zealand]] both dwelt in circular [[fortification|fort]]s (named ''''[[tulou]]'''' and ''''[[pā]]'''' respectively)?
 
* ... that the '''[[Hakka people]]''' of [[southern China]] and the '''[[Māori people|haka warriors]]''' of [[New Zealand]] both dwelt in circular [[fortification|fort]]s (named ''''[[tulou]]'''' and ''''[[pā]]'''' respectively)?
 
** '''ALT1''':... that ...?  <small>Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... that ...?  <small>Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)</small>
Line 16: Line 12:
 
:* ''Comment'': double semantic coincidence here (hak(k)a homonymy + the fact that both happened to live in circular forts ; as a result the hook is made up of four articles
 
:* ''Comment'': double semantic coincidence here (hak(k)a homonymy + the fact that both happened to live in circular forts ; as a result the hook is made up of four articles
 
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:Couiros22|Couiros22]] ([[User talk:Couiros22|talk]]). Self-nominated at 12:00, 12 December 2019 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:Couiros22|Couiros22]] ([[User talk:Couiros22|talk]]). Self-nominated at 12:00, 12 December 2019 (UTC).</small>
<!--Please check to make sure these auto-generated credits are correct.
 
* {{DYKmake|Hakka people|Couiros22}}
 
* {{DYKnom|Hakka people|Couiros22}}
 
* {{DYKmake|tulou|Couiros22}}
 
* {{DYKnom|tulou|Couiros22}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Hi [[User:Couiros22|Couiros22]].  To be featured in DYK ([[Wikipedia:Did you know|per the rules listed here]]) articles need to be newly created, recently expanded by 5x in length or recently approved as good articles.  I don't think any of these apply to the articles you've nominated above? - [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 12:41, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Hi [[User:Couiros22|Couiros22]].  To be featured in DYK ([[Wikipedia:Did you know|per the rules listed here]]) articles need to be newly created, recently expanded by 5x in length or recently approved as good articles.  I don't think any of these apply to the articles you've nominated above? - [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 12:41, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Line 27: Line 17:
 
::::{{ping|Cowlibob}} So ?? [[User:Couiros22|Couiros22]] ([[User talk:Couiros22|talk]]) 17:22, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
 
::::{{ping|Cowlibob}} So ?? [[User:Couiros22|Couiros22]] ([[User talk:Couiros22|talk]]) 17:22, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
 
::::: The previous nomination was ineligible for the same reason as this one, it has not been expanded, not new, not a GA etc. It was also incorrectly titled as this one is. I fear that you're nominating for DYK purely as it is an interesting piece of trivia [[Wikipedia:DYKNOT]] rather than per the rules. Please refer to the [[Wikipedia:DYKRULES]] before nominating again. It may be beneficial to ask some of our regular nominators before nominating so that they can check it or you may become frustrated as your nominations keep being rejected. [[User:Cowlibob|Cowlibob]] ([[User talk:Cowlibob|talk]]) 17:32, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
 
::::: The previous nomination was ineligible for the same reason as this one, it has not been expanded, not new, not a GA etc. It was also incorrectly titled as this one is. I fear that you're nominating for DYK purely as it is an interesting piece of trivia [[Wikipedia:DYKNOT]] rather than per the rules. Please refer to the [[Wikipedia:DYKRULES]] before nominating again. It may be beneficial to ask some of our regular nominators before nominating so that they can check it or you may become frustrated as your nominations keep being rejected. [[User:Cowlibob|Cowlibob]] ([[User talk:Cowlibob|talk]]) 17:32, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
:::::: fopdoodle [[User:Couiros22|Couiros22]] ([[User talk:Couiros22|talk]]) 17:49, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
+
:::::: fopdoodle [[User:Couiros22|Couiros22]] ([[User talk:Couiros22|talk]]) 17:49, 12 December 2019 (UTC)</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 17:58, 12 December 2019

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BlueMoonset (talk) 17:57, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Nominator has not created, expanded, or even edited the four bold-linked articles; none of them are remotely eligible for DYK.

Hakka people, tulou

  • ... that the Hakka people of southern China and the haka warriors of New Zealand both dwelt in circular forts (named 'tulou' and '' respectively)?
    • ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
  • Comment: double semantic coincidence here (hak(k)a homonymy + the fact that both happened to live in circular forts ; as a result the hook is made up of four articles

Created/expanded by Couiros22 (talk). Self-nominated at 12:00, 12 December 2019 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Hi Couiros22. To be featured in DYK (per the rules listed here) articles need to be newly created, recently expanded by 5x in length or recently approved as good articles. I don't think any of these apply to the articles you've nominated above? - Dumelow (talk) 12:41, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Symbol delete vote.svg As above, I don't think the nominator is aware of what DYK is for as they also nominated this one in November. Template:Did you know nominations/bongos eat burnt wood Cowlibob (talk) 15:34, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Template:Ping So ?? Couiros22 (talk) 17:22, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
The previous nomination was ineligible for the same reason as this one, it has not been expanded, not new, not a GA etc. It was also incorrectly titled as this one is. I fear that you're nominating for DYK purely as it is an interesting piece of trivia Wikipedia:DYKNOT rather than per the rules. Please refer to the Wikipedia:DYKRULES before nominating again. It may be beneficial to ask some of our regular nominators before nominating so that they can check it or you may become frustrated as your nominations keep being rejected. Cowlibob (talk) 17:32, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
fopdoodle Couiros22 (talk) 17:49, 12 December 2019 (UTC)