Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/iOS 7"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Sceptre
(Created page with '{{subst:NewDYKnomination | article = iOS 7 | article2 = | status = new | hook = ... that the Jony Ive-designed '''i...')
 
imported>Crispulop
(comments)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* <!--Write first comment here, by replacing this line-->
+
:*   [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] This is not a proper review, just a couple of comments:
 +
1) It seems difficult for this article to comply with articles D6 and D7 of the Supplementary guidelines. (No edit-warring and an article should be complete, not a work in progress). At the moment there seems to be some edit warring, and the article is still a work in progress.
 +
2) You have not reviewed another hook yet, as per QPQ
 +
3) You did not create the article as you stated here above, rather you helped expand it. There are quite a number of author's who worked on this article. It seems only fair to give the most important of them credit as well. 4) Not all references are ideally formated yet.
 +
[[User:Crispulop|Crispulop]] ([[User talk:Crispulop|talk]]) 21:05, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 +
 
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 21:05, 18 June 2013

iOS 7

  • Comment: No opposition to a better hook; hopefully I should have it fully expanded by the end of the week.

Created by Sceptre (talk). Self nominated at 20:17, 14 June 2013 (UTC).

  • Symbol possible vote.svg This is not a proper review, just a couple of comments:

1) It seems difficult for this article to comply with articles D6 and D7 of the Supplementary guidelines. (No edit-warring and an article should be complete, not a work in progress). At the moment there seems to be some edit warring, and the article is still a work in progress. 2) You have not reviewed another hook yet, as per QPQ 3) You did not create the article as you stated here above, rather you helped expand it. There are quite a number of author's who worked on this article. It seems only fair to give the most important of them credit as well. 4) Not all references are ideally formated yet. Crispulop (talk) 21:05, 18 June 2013 (UTC)