Difference between revisions of "Template:Editnotices/Group/Template:Did you know nominations"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Maile66
(remove Prep set instructions from this template)
imported>SoWhy
(adding reviewer's template code in a collapsible box so people can quickly access the template when reviewing)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{#ifexist:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|{{DYK review criteria}}
 
{{#ifexist:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|{{DYK review criteria}}
{{DYKSymbols2}}}}
+
{{DYKSymbols2}}
 +
{{cot|[[Template:DYK checklist|Reviewer's template]] for easy copy+paste}}
 +
'''Blank template:'''
 +
<pre>{{DYK checklist
 +
<!--Usage instructions: If the article/nomination is compliant with the relevant guideline, put "y"; if not, state what the problem is --->
 +
|newness      = <!---Was the article created, expanded (5x), moved to mainspace, or promoted to Good Article status within 7 days of the nomination?--->
 +
|length      = <!---Is the article at least 1500 bytes long and not a stub?--->
 +
|eligibilityother = <!---Note other general eligibility problems here (for example, article previously appeared on DYK); leave blank for none--->
 +
|sourced      = <!---Does the article contain at least one citation to a reliable source for each paragraph and direct quote?--->
 +
|neutral      = <!---Does the article cover all major viewpoints in a straightforward manner without using promotional or overly negative language?--->
 +
|plagiarismfree = <!---Is the article free of material copied from other sources?--->
 +
|policyother  = <!---Note other policy problems here (for example, article copied from another Wikipedia article without attribution); leave blank for none--->
 +
|hookcited    = <!---Check to see if the hook fact is backed by a source. If it is, check the source (if readily available) and make sure it contains the fact and is reliable. "AGF" (assume good faith) may be entered if hook it cited to an offline source--->
 +
|hookinterest = <!---Is the hook reasonably interesting?--->
 +
|hookother    = <!---Note other hook problems here (for example, hook is over 200 characters); leave blank for none--->
 +
|picfree      = <!---If the hook has a picture, is it freely licensed?  If no picture is used, put "NA"--->
 +
|picused      = <!---Is the picture used in the article (hook image may be a crop of an article image)?  If no picture is used, leave blank--->
 +
|picclear    = <!---Is the picture easily discernible at 100px?  If no picture is used, leave blank--->
 +
|qpq          = <!---Check to make sure the nominator did a proper QPQ. If no QPQ was required (for example, user has less than five DYK credits), put "NA"--->
 +
|status      = <!---Put "y" if no problems, "?" for minor problems, "maybe" if nomination needs work, "no" if completely ineligible, "again" to request another reviewer take a look--->
 +
|comments    = <!---Put any other comments you may have here--->
 +
|sign        = ~~~~<!---Your signature.  Generally, can be left as is--->
 +
}}</pre>
 +
 
 +
'''Blank template without comments:'''
 +
<pre>{{DYK checklist
 +
|newness      =
 +
|length      =
 +
|eligibilityother =
 +
|sourced      =
 +
|neutral      =
 +
|plagiarismfree =
 +
|policyother  =
 +
|hookcited    =
 +
|hookinterest =
 +
|hookother    =
 +
|picfree      =
 +
|picused      =
 +
|picclear    =
 +
|qpq          =
 +
|status      =
 +
|comments    =
 +
|sign        =
 +
}}</pre>
 +
{{cob}}}}

Revision as of 11:58, 6 July 2018

  1. REDIRECT Wikipedia:Did you know/review criteria


  • From a page move: This is a redirect from a page that has been moved (renamed). This page was kept as a redirect to avoid breaking links, both internal and external, that may have been made to the old page name.
Symbol Code DYK Ready? Description
Symbol confirmed.svg {{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK
Symbol voting keep.svg {{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language, offline hook reference, or reference behind a paywall accepted in good faith
Symbol question.svg {{subst:DYK?}} Query DYK eligibility requires that an issue be addressed. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article|header=yes|sig=yes}}
Symbol possible vote.svg {{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe DYK eligibility requires additional work. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article|header=yes|sig=yes}}
Symbol delete vote.svg {{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article|header=yes|sig=yes}}
Symbol redirect vote 4.svg {{subst:DYK?again}} New review Article issues have been resolved and is ready for a new review.

An article cannot be officially promoted until a reviewer has given approval (Symbol confirmed.svg or Symbol voting keep.svg) to at least one of the article's hooks.


Reviewer's template for easy copy+paste

Blank template:

{{DYK checklist
<!--Usage instructions: If the article/nomination is compliant with the relevant guideline, put "y"; if not, state what the problem is --->
|newness      = <!---Was the article created, expanded (5x), moved to mainspace, or promoted to Good Article status within 7 days of the nomination?--->
|length       = <!---Is the article at least 1500 bytes long and not a stub?--->
|eligibilityother = <!---Note other general eligibility problems here (for example, article previously appeared on DYK); leave blank for none--->
|sourced      = <!---Does the article contain at least one citation to a reliable source for each paragraph and direct quote?--->
|neutral      = <!---Does the article cover all major viewpoints in a straightforward manner without using promotional or overly negative language?--->
|plagiarismfree = <!---Is the article free of material copied from other sources?--->
|policyother  = <!---Note other policy problems here (for example, article copied from another Wikipedia article without attribution); leave blank for none--->
|hookcited    = <!---Check to see if the hook fact is backed by a source. If it is, check the source (if readily available) and make sure it contains the fact and is reliable. "AGF" (assume good faith) may be entered if hook it cited to an offline source--->
|hookinterest = <!---Is the hook reasonably interesting?--->
|hookother    = <!---Note other hook problems here (for example, hook is over 200 characters); leave blank for none--->
|picfree      = <!---If the hook has a picture, is it freely licensed?  If no picture is used, put "NA"--->
|picused      = <!---Is the picture used in the article (hook image may be a crop of an article image)?  If no picture is used, leave blank--->
|picclear     = <!---Is the picture easily discernible at 100px?  If no picture is used, leave blank--->
|qpq          = <!---Check to make sure the nominator did a proper QPQ. If no QPQ was required (for example, user has less than five DYK credits), put "NA"--->
|status       = <!---Put "y" if no problems, "?" for minor problems, "maybe" if nomination needs work, "no" if completely ineligible, "again" to request another reviewer take a look--->
|comments     = <!---Put any other comments you may have here--->
|sign         = ~~~~<!---Your signature.  Generally, can be left as is--->
}}

Blank template without comments:

{{DYK checklist
|newness      = 
|length       = 
|eligibilityother = 
|sourced      = 
|neutral      = 
|plagiarismfree = 
|policyother  = 
|hookcited    = 
|hookinterest = 
|hookother    = 
|picfree      = 
|picused      = 
|picclear     = 
|qpq          = 
|status       = 
|comments     = 
|sign         = 
}}