Difference between revisions of "Template:Editnotices/Page/0.999..."
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>The Anome (borrowing style from Template:Three Kingdoms notice) |
imported>Jonesey95 (Fix Linter errors) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| header = Notice to editors | | header = Notice to editors | ||
| headerstyle = font-size: 150%; color:darkred; | | headerstyle = font-size: 150%; color:darkred; | ||
− | | text = Please note that the content of this article is well-established. If you disagree with the underlying mathematics behind this article, or have an argument against one or more of the proofs listed here, please read the FAQ on [[Talk:0.999...]], or discuss it on [[Talk:0.999.../Arguments]], before attempting to edit here.< | + | | text = Please note that the content of this article is well-established. If you disagree with the underlying mathematics behind this article, or have an argument against one or more of the proofs listed here, please read the FAQ on [[Talk:0.999...]], or discuss it on [[Talk:0.999.../Arguments]], before attempting to edit here.<br/>For mathematicians: please understand that the earlier, more naive proofs are not as rigorous as the later ones as they intend to appeal to intuition, and as such may require further justification to be complete. Thank you. |
| textstyle = | | textstyle = | ||
| image = [[File:Ambox deletion.png|alt=|link=]] | | image = [[File:Ambox deletion.png|alt=|link=]] | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 08:58, 3 October 2018
![]() | This editnotice (for Template:Pagelinks) is set never to expire. To adjust this setting, please update the |expiry= parameter. |
![]() | Notice to editors
Please note that the content of this article is well-established. If you disagree with the underlying mathematics behind this article, or have an argument against one or more of the proofs listed here, please read the FAQ on Talk:0.999..., or discuss it on Talk:0.999.../Arguments, before attempting to edit here.For mathematicians: please understand that the earlier, more naive proofs are not as rigorous as the later ones as they intend to appeal to intuition, and as such may require further justification to be complete. Thank you. |