Difference between revisions of "Template:Failed verification/doc"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>SMcCandlish (This is a dispute not cleanup template (source is directly disputed under WP:V policy)) |
imported>SMcCandlish (cat. update) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
<includeonly> | <includeonly> | ||
<!-- ADD CATEGORIES BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ADD CATEGORIES BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Inline citation and verifiability dispute templates|{{PAGENAME}}]] |
| − | |||
<!-- ADD INTERWIKIS BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ADD INTERWIKIS BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
Revision as of 20:24, 29 January 2010
| This is a documentation subpage for Template:Failed verification. It contains usage information, categories and other content that is not part of the original template page. |
The {{failed verification}} tag will categorise tagged articles into Category:Articles with unsourced statements. This template is a self-reference and thus is part of the Wikipedia project rather than the encyclopaedic content.
Usage
- Common form (with current date)
{{failed verification|date=January 2026}}
Use this tag only if a source is given, you have checked the source, and found that the source says something other than what is contained in the text, or for whatever reason is illegible or unreadable. Explain in detail on the talk page. If the source given is an unreachable website, use {{dead link}} instead.
Redirects
- {{Fv}}
- {{FV}}
- {{Not in source}}
- {{Notinsource}}
- {{Verification failed}}
See also
- Wikipedia:Citing sources
- {{Citation}}
- {{Cite check}}, for tagging an article or section that has multiple inappropriate citations
- {{Request quotation}}, for requesting a quote from a citation to verify that it has been interpreted correctly