Difference between revisions of "Template:Fictionlist"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>CmdrObot m (sp: encylopedic→encyclopedic) |
imported>DreamGuy (this is for nonfiction topics, so "unimportant to overall plot" makes no sense, as there is no plot as it's not for fiction topics) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| type = style | | type = style | ||
| text = '''This {{{1|article or section}}} has too many [[fiction]]al references for an encyclopedic and academic approach of this topic.'''<br /> | | text = '''This {{{1|article or section}}} has too many [[fiction]]al references for an encyclopedic and academic approach of this topic.'''<br /> | ||
| − | <small>An article about a [[nonfiction]] topic should only contain fictional references of historic importance so as to not overshadow the main topic | + | <small>An article about a [[nonfiction]] topic should only contain fictional references of historic importance so as to not overshadow the main topic. Mere references or trivia unimportant to the main topic should be deleted.</small> |
}}<includeonly>{{{category|[[Category:Articles with fictioncruft]]}}}</includeonly><noinclude> | }}<includeonly>{{{category|[[Category:Articles with fictioncruft]]}}}</includeonly><noinclude> | ||
Revision as of 17:25, 4 July 2009
This article or section has too many fictional references for an encyclopedic and academic approach of this topic. An article about a nonfiction topic should only contain fictional references of historic importance so as to not overshadow the main topic. Mere references or trivia unimportant to the main topic should be deleted. |
This template is a self-reference. This template is not useful for Wikipedia:Subst.
This template is for use when a nonfiction article has become overcrowded with too many references to fiction or other pop culture. (Ex.: Article on horses having a long section of TV shows, movies, video games, etc. that have horse in the name or feature horses in some way.)