Difference between revisions of "Template:GAList"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This is a nice piece of work, but it still has some shortcomings with respect to the good article criteria.
imported>Rcsprinter123 (bypass redirects) |
imported>Relentlessly (correct link to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Embedded lists) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#if:{{{overcom|}}}|<hr width=50%>{{{overcom}}}|}} | {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#if:{{{overcom|}}}|<hr width=50%>{{{overcom}}}|}} | ||
#It is '''reasonably well written'''. | #It is '''reasonably well written'''. | ||
| − | #:a ''(prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar)'': {{GAList/check|{{{1a}}}}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] for [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section|lead]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout|layout]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch|word choice]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Embedded | + | #:a ''(prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar)'': {{GAList/check|{{{1a}}}}} b ''([[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] for [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section|lead]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout|layout]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch|word choice]], [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Embedded lists|lists]])'': {{GAList/check|{{{1b}}}}} |
#:: {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#if:{{{1com|}}}|{{{1com}}}|}} | #:: {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#if:{{{1com|}}}|{{{1com}}}|}} | ||
#It is '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]'''. | #It is '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]'''. | ||
Revision as of 17:08, 4 May 2015
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): Unknown b (citations to reliable sources): Unknown c (OR): Unknown
- a (reference section): Unknown b (citations to reliable sources): Unknown c (OR): Unknown
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): Unknown b (focused): Unknown
- a (major aspects): Unknown b (focused): Unknown
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias: Unknown
- Fair representation without bias: Unknown
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.: Unknown
- No edit wars, etc.: Unknown
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): Unknown b (appropriate use with suitable captions): Unknown
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): Unknown b (appropriate use with suitable captions): Unknown
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail: Unknown
- Pass/Fail: Unknown
Usage
{{subst:GAList|1a=|1b=|2a=|2b=|2c=|2d=|3a=|3b=|4=|5=|6a=|6b=|7=}}
or, full usage:
{{subst:GAList
|overcom=
|1a=
|1b=
|1com=
|2a=
|2b=
|2c=
|2d=
|2com=
|3a=
|3b=
|3com=
|4=
|4com=
|5=
|5com=
|6a=
|6b=
|6com=
|7=
|7com=
}}
Available arguments are y,n and ?; some synonyms are also available for these arguments; any other argument or no argument at all gives an undecided mark. Note that the template should be substituted, as the GA guidelines are reviewed from time to time and this template may be changed.
The template also allows comments to be added to the top of the review, and also to each numbered item, using additional parametersovercom, 1com, 2com, ... 7com.See the example below for usage.
Example
{{subst:GAList
|overcom=This is a nice piece of work, but it still has some shortcomings with respect to the good article criteria.
|1a=y|1b=y
|2a=y|2b=n|2c=y|2d=y|2com=The sources are not sufficient to cover the controversial material in section 3
|3a=y|3b=y|4=?|4com=Is section 3 really neutral?
|5=y|6a=|6b=y|6com=I'm not convinced that the fair use rationale for the photograph in section 5 is valid
|7=n|7com= Good luck improving the article}}
results in:
This is a nice piece of work, but it still has some shortcomings with respect to the good article criteria.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources): Fail c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- The sources are not sufficient to cover the controversial material in section 3
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is section 3 really neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): Unknown b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- I'm not convinced that the fair use rationale for the photograph in section 5 is valid
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): Unknown b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail: Fail
- Good luck improving the article
- Pass/Fail: Fail
See also
- {{GAList/check}}
| The above documentation is transcluded from Template:GAList/doc. (edit | history) Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox (create | mirror) and testcases (create) pages. Please add categories to the /doc subpage. Subpages of this template. |