Difference between revisions of "Template:GAList2/doc"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>GoingBatty
m (→‎Example: General fixes, typo(s) fixed: etc: → etc.: using AWB (11376))
imported>Grondemar
(Updated to reflect addition of criteria 2d on copyvio and plagiarism.)
Line 16: Line 16:
 
|2c=
 
|2c=
 
|2ccom=
 
|2ccom=
 +
|2d=
 +
|2dcom=
 
|3a=
 
|3a=
 
|3acom=
 
|3acom=
Line 49: Line 51:
 
|2c=???
 
|2c=???
 
|2ccom=Some of the information in the third section appears to be OR.
 
|2ccom=Some of the information in the third section appears to be OR.
 +
|2d=y
 
|3a=y
 
|3a=y
 
|3b=y
 
|3b=y
Line 65: Line 68:
 
<hr width=50%>This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
 
<hr width=50%>This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
 
#Is it '''reasonably well written'''?
 
#Is it '''reasonably well written'''?
#:A. Prose quality: {{GAList/check|y}}  
+
#:A. Prose is "[[MOS:JARGON|clear]] and [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|concise]]", without spelling and grammar errors: {{GAList/check|y}}  
 
#:: Well done.
 
#:: Well done.
 
#:B. [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] compliance for [[WP:LEAD|lead]], [[WP:LAYOUT|layout]], [[WP:WTW|words to watch]], [[WP:WAF|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (embedded lists)|lists]]: {{GAList/check|y}}
 
#:B. [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|MoS]] compliance for [[WP:LEAD|lead]], [[WP:LAYOUT|layout]], [[WP:WTW|words to watch]], [[WP:WAF|fiction]], and [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (embedded lists)|lists]]: {{GAList/check|y}}
 
#::  
 
#::  
 
#Is it '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]'''?
 
#Is it '''factually accurate''' and '''[[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]]'''?
#:A. Has an [[Wikipedia:LAYOUT#Standard appendices and footers|appropriate reference section]]: {{GAList/check|y}}  
+
#:A. Has an [[Wikipedia:LAYOUT#Standard_appendices_and_footers|appropriate reference section]]: {{GAList/check|y}}  
 
#::  
 
#::  
#:B. Cites [[WP:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources]]: {{GAList/check|y}}  
+
#:B. Cites [[WP:Identifying reliable sources|reliable sources]], [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria/where necessary|where necessary]]: {{GAList/check|y}}  
 
#::  
 
#::  
 
#:C. [[Wikipedia:No original research|No original research]]: {{GAList/check|???}}
 
#:C. [[Wikipedia:No original research|No original research]]: {{GAList/check|???}}
 
#:: Some of the information in the third section appears to be OR.
 
#:: Some of the information in the third section appears to be OR.
 +
#:D. No [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright violations]] nor [[Wikipedia:Plagiarism|plagiarism]]: {{GAList/check|y}}
 +
#::
 
#Is it '''broad in its coverage'''?
 
#Is it '''broad in its coverage'''?
#:A. [[Wikipedia:Scope|Major aspects]]: {{GAList/check|y}}  
+
#:A. [[Wikipedia:Out of scope|Major aspects]]: {{GAList/check|y}}  
 
#::  
 
#::  
#:B. [[WP:LENGTH|Focused]]: {{GAList/check|y}}
+
#:B. [[WP:LENGTH|Focused]] (see [[WP:summary style|summary style]]): {{GAList/check|y}}
 
#::  
 
#::  
 
#Is it '''[[WP:NPOV|neutral]]'''?
 
#Is it '''[[WP:NPOV|neutral]]'''?
Line 85: Line 90:
 
#::  
 
#::  
 
#Is it '''stable'''?
 
#Is it '''stable'''?
#: No [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit wars]], etc.: {{GAList/check|}}
+
#: No [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit wars]], etc: {{GAList/check|}}
 
#::  
 
#::  
 
#Does it '''contain [[Wikipedia:Images|images]]''' to illustrate the topic?
 
#Does it '''contain [[Wikipedia:Images|images]]''' to illustrate the topic?
Line 95: Line 100:
 
#:Pass or Fail: {{GAList/check|n}}
 
#:Pass or Fail: {{GAList/check|n}}
 
#:: Good luck with improving this article!
 
#:: Good luck with improving this article!
 +
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==

Revision as of 04:42, 2 December 2015

Usage

{{subst:GAList2
|overcom=
|1a=
|1acom=
|1b=
|1bcom=
|2a=
|2acom=
|2b=
|2bcom=
|2c=
|2ccom=
|2d=
|2dcom=
|3a=
|3acom=
|3b=
|3bcom=
|4=
|4com=
|5=
|5com=
|6a=
|6acom=
|6b=
|6bcom=
|7=
|7com=
}}

Available arguments are y, n, aye, nay, wtf, and ???; some synonyms are also available for these arguments. Any other argument or no argument at all gives an undecided mark.

The comment lines ("com") are used for additional notes. If no comment is included, the comment line doesn't appear. This is also true of "overcom", which allows for general comments before the subsections.

Note that the template should be substituted, as the GA guidelines are reviewed from time to time and this template may be changed.

Example

{{subst:GAList2
|overcom=This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
|1a=y
|1acom=Well done.
|1b=y
|2a=y
|2b=y
|2c=???
|2ccom=Some of the information in the third section appears to be OR.
|2d=y
|3a=y
|3b=y
|4=y
|5=
|6a=n
|6b=y
|7=n
|7com=Good luck with improving this article!
}}

results in:

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without spelling and grammar errors:
    Well done.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:
    C. No original research:
    Some of the information in the third section appears to be OR.
    D. No copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Good luck with improving this article!


See also