Difference between revisions of "Template:GAQFList"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Joe Gazz84
imported>Frietjes
(use template:require subst per tfd of substchecktop/substcheckbottom)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<includeonly>{{{{{|safesubst:}}}substchecktop|{{subst:BASEPAGENAME}}|subst={{{subst|}}}}}</includeonly>===Quick-Fail Good Article Assessment===
+
<includeonly>{{safesubst:require subst|template=GAQFList|1=</includeonly>===Quick-Fail Good Article Assessment===
 
This article was assessed against the [[Wikipedia:Reviewing_good_articles#First_things_to_look_for|quick fail criteria]]. This is how the article, as of {{{{{|safesubst:}}}CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{{{{|safesubst:}}}CURRENTDAY}}, {{{{{|safesubst:}}}CURRENTYEAR}}, compares against the  [[Wikipedia:Reviewing_good_articles#First_things_to_look_for|quick fail criteria]]:
 
This article was assessed against the [[Wikipedia:Reviewing_good_articles#First_things_to_look_for|quick fail criteria]]. This is how the article, as of {{{{{|safesubst:}}}CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{{{{|safesubst:}}}CURRENTDAY}}, {{{{{|safesubst:}}}CURRENTYEAR}}, compares against the  [[Wikipedia:Reviewing_good_articles#First_things_to_look_for|quick fail criteria]]:
  
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
These items all need to say '''Pass''' by them in order for the reviewer to move on to the next stage of reviewing. If one said fail, there will be in indication as to why. The reviewer will indicate the final status here: {{{final|}}}
 
These items all need to say '''Pass''' by them in order for the reviewer to move on to the next stage of reviewing. If one said fail, there will be in indication as to why. The reviewer will indicate the final status here: {{{final|}}}
<noinclude>
+
<includeonly>}}</includeonly><noinclude>
 
<!--
 
<!--
 
     PLEASE DO NOT ADD DOCUMENTATION/CATEGORIES/INTERWIKIS HERE
 
     PLEASE DO NOT ADD DOCUMENTATION/CATEGORIES/INTERWIKIS HERE

Latest revision as of 19:31, 14 September 2016

Quick-Fail Good Article Assessment

This article was assessed against the quick fail criteria. This is how the article, as of December 27, 2025, compares against the quick fail criteria:

1. No obvious non-reliable sources?:
2. Is it neutral?:
3. No outstanding cleanup tags?:
4. Article is not subject of recent/current edit war?:
5. Changing in article is not rapid?
Reason for Closure Decision:

These items all need to say Pass by them in order for the reviewer to move on to the next stage of reviewing. If one said fail, there will be in indication as to why. The reviewer will indicate the final status here:

Template documentation[view] [edit] [history] [purge]

Usage

Usage summary

All fields are optional.

{{subst:GAQFList
|reliable sources = 
|neutral = 
|cleanp = 
|edit war = 
|rapid = 
|result reason = 
|final = <!-- {{Pass}} or {{Fail}} -->
}}— ~~~~

Note

See also