Difference between revisions of "Template:GAQFList/sandbox"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Joe Gazz84
(Created page with '<!-- Add your experimental template code here --><noinclude> {{template sandbox notice}} </noinclude> {{subst:FGAN |reliable sources = Fail |neutral = Fail |cle...')
 
imported>Joe Gazz84
Line 5: Line 5:
 
{{template sandbox notice}}
 
{{template sandbox notice}}
 
</noinclude>
 
</noinclude>
===Failed "good article" nomination===
+
===Quick-Fail Good Article Assessment===
This article failed [[WP:GAN|good article nomination]]. This is how the article, as of March 13, 2011, compares against the  [[Wikipedia:What is a good article?|six good article criteria]]:
+
This article was assessed against the [[Wikipedia:Reviewing_good_articles#First_things_to_look_for|quick fail criteria]]. This is how the article, as of March 13, 2011, compares against the  [[Wikipedia:Reviewing_good_articles#First_things_to_look_for|quick fail criteria]]:
  
:'''1. Well written?:''' Pass
+
:'''1. No obvious non-reliable sources?:''' Fail
:'''2. Factually accurate?:''' Pass
+
:'''2. Is it neutral?:''' Fail
:'''3. Broad in coverage?:''' Pass
+
:'''3. No outstanding cleanup tags?:'''  
:'''4. Neutral point of view?:''' Pass
+
:'''4. Article is not subject of recent/current edit war?:''' Fail
:'''5. Article stability?''' Pass
+
:'''5. Changing in article is not rapid?''' Fail
:'''6. Images?:''' Pass
 
  
 
Failed since all are bad.
 
Failed since all are bad.
  
When these issues are addressed, the article can be [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|renominated]]. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it have it [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment|reassessed]].  Thank you for your work so far.<!-- Template:FGAN -->— <span style="border:1px solid;background:#FFFFFF">[[User:Joe_Gazz84|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white">&nbsp;JoeGazz&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Joe_Gazz84|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:red;">&nbsp;▲&nbsp;</span>]]</span> 23:27, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
+
These items all need to say '''Pass''' by them in order for the reviewer to move on to the next stage of reviewing. If one said fail, there will be in indication as to why. The reviewer will indicate the final status here: {{notdone|Failed}}
 +
<!--
 +
    PLEASE DO NOT ADD DOCUMENTATION/CATEGORIES/INTERWIKIS HERE
 +
-->
 +
{{Documentation}}
 +
<!--
 +
    MAKE ADDITIONS TO THE /doc SUBPAGE INSTEAD, THANKS
 +
-->
 +
</noinclude>— <span style="border:1px solid;background:#FFFFFF">[[User:Joe_Gazz84|'''<span style="background:#00008B;color:white">&nbsp;JoeGazz&nbsp;</span>''']][[User talk:Joe_Gazz84|<span style="color:#00008B;background-color:red;">&nbsp;▲&nbsp;</span>]]</span> 23:27, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:27, 13 March 2011


Quick-Fail Good Article Assessment

This article was assessed against the quick fail criteria. This is how the article, as of March 13, 2011, compares against the quick fail criteria:

1. No obvious non-reliable sources?: Fail
2. Is it neutral?: Fail
3. No outstanding cleanup tags?:
4. Article is not subject of recent/current edit war?: Fail
5. Changing in article is not rapid? Fail

Failed since all are bad.

These items all need to say Pass by them in order for the reviewer to move on to the next stage of reviewing. If one said fail, there will be in indication as to why. The reviewer will indicate the final status here: Template:Notdone

Template documentation[view] [edit] [history] [purge]

Usage

Usage summary

All fields are optional.

{{subst:GAQFList
|reliable sources = 
|neutral = 
|cleanp = 
|edit war = 
|rapid = 
|result reason = 
|final = <!-- {{Pass}} or {{Fail}} -->
}}— ~~~~

Note

See also

 JoeGazz  ▲  23:27, 13 March 2011 (UTC)