Difference between revisions of "Template:GAR/editintro1"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Aircorn
(Restore version. Need more time to work this out)
imported>Prhartcom
(Copy edit and standardize across the GA edit intro pages.)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="position:absolute; right: 60px; top:95px;background-color:#F0FFEC;padding:0px"><span class="plainlinks" style="color: #black; font-size:0.88em;"> &nbsp; ''Please report any problems on the [[WT:GAN|Good article nominations talk page]]'' &nbsp; </span></div>
 
 
<div style="padding:8px 8px 8px 8px; background-color:#30B060; text-align:left; font-size:0.92em;">[[Image:Emblem-important-red.svg|30px|right]]</div>
 
<div style="padding:8px 8px 8px 8px; background-color:#30B060; text-align:left; font-size:0.92em;">[[Image:Emblem-important-red.svg|30px|right]]</div>
 
<div class="NavHead" style="padding:2px 30px 2px 30px; background-color:#F0FFEC; border: 2px solid #30B060; text-align:left; font-size:0.92em;">
 
<div class="NavHead" style="padding:2px 30px 2px 30px; background-color:#F0FFEC; border: 2px solid #30B060; text-align:left; font-size:0.92em;">
 
<h3>How to start an individual reassessment</h3>
 
<h3>How to start an individual reassessment</h3>
  
Good article reassessments by individual editors are stored on subpages of the article talk page. (If you would like community input to reassess this article, please return to the talk page and follow the link to create a community reassessment.) To start your reassessment you need to create this subpage (i.e., {{FULLPAGENAME}}), and that is the purpose of the edit box below.
+
A [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment|good article individual reassessment]] is stored on a subpage of the article talk page. Your first job in initiating an individual reassessment is to create such a subpage, and that is the purpose of the edit box below.
  
To do this, '''add your rationale''' for reassessing the article '''after''' the comment line in the edit window. The usual reason for starting an individual reassessment is that you believe the article does not meet the [[WP:WIAGA|GA criteria]], so you should explain which criteria it fails and why. Explicit, actionable examples are much preferred to general statements.
+
Leave an assessment on this page, detailing your reasons for bringing the article to good article reassessment. List the problems you found with the article in comparison to the [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria |good article criteria]]. If you believe the article should be delisted, be sure to mention which of the good article criteria the article does not meet. Sign it, then save this page.
  
Then sign with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) and save this page. Once you have done this, return to the article talk page, and add '''<nowiki>{{</nowiki>{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}''' to the bottom of the last section of the article talk. This will cause a [[WP:Transclusion|copy of this page]] to appear at the end of the article talk page, so that it is more visible to other editors.
+
Return to the article talk page, create a new section, and add <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}</code> to the bottom of the last section of the article talk. This will cause a [[WP:Transclusion|copy of this page]] to appear at the end of the article talk page, so that it is more visible to other editors.
  
Further comments can be added to the reassessment discussion by editing this page.
+
The reassessment may be continued later by editing this page.
 
+
----
'''Please give other editors time to respond to this reassessment before delisting the article.'''
+
''All good articles must meet the [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|good article criteria]]. For more information about reassessment, please read the [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment#delist|instructions for reassessment]]. You may ask any questions or seek help at the [[Wikipedia:Good article help|good article help desk]].''
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 06:46, 4 March 2016

Emblem-important-red.svg