Difference between revisions of "Template:GAR/editintro2"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Geometry guy
m (moved Template:GAR/editintro to Template:GAR/editintro2: Need separate page for individual reassessments)
imported>Geometry guy
(Add sentence on individual reassessment option)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
<h3>How to complete your good article reassessment request</h3>
 
<h3>How to complete your good article reassessment request</h3>
  
Good article reassessments by the community are stored on subpages of [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment]]. <!-- Something about individual reassessments --> To complete your request for such a reassessment you need to create this subpage (i.e., {{FULLPAGENAME}}), and that is the purpose of the edit box below.
+
Good article reassessments by the community are stored on subpages of [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment]]. (If you believe you are able to reassess this article yourself, please return to the talk page and follow the link to create an individual reassessment.) To complete your request for a community reassessment you need to create this subpage (i.e., {{FULLPAGENAME}}), and that is the purpose of the edit box below.
  
 
To do this, '''add your rationale''' for bringing up the article for Good article reassessment '''after''' the comment line in the edit window. If you believe the article should be delisted, be sure to mention which of the [[WP:WIAGA|GA criteria]] the article doesn’t meet and why. If you believe it should be listed, explain your reasons for bringing it here, rather than simply renominating it. Links to relevant discussions and reviews can also be helpful.
 
To do this, '''add your rationale''' for bringing up the article for Good article reassessment '''after''' the comment line in the edit window. If you believe the article should be delisted, be sure to mention which of the [[WP:WIAGA|GA criteria]] the article doesn’t meet and why. If you believe it should be listed, explain your reasons for bringing it here, rather than simply renominating it. Links to relevant discussions and reviews can also be helpful.

Revision as of 11:28, 29 June 2008

  Please report any problems on the Good article reassessment talk page