Difference between revisions of "Template:GAR/sandbox"
imported>Retro (How about this? This seems very likely to be the issue.) |
imported>Retro (Here is something I'm curious about... oh, I am so happy, I just noticed a bug I introduced.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ {{{|safesubst:}}}#if:<includeonly>{{ {{{|safesubst:}}}#ifeq:{{subst:NAMESPACE}}| | + | {{ {{{|safesubst:}}}#if:<includeonly>{{ {{{|safesubst:}}}#ifeq:{{{namespace|{{subst:NAMESPACE}}}}}|Talk|1}}</includeonly>{{ {{{|safesubst:}}}#ifeq:{{{preview|<noinclude>yes</noinclude>}}}|yes|1}}|{{GAR/link|{{ {{{|safesubst:}}}5~}}|page={{ {{{|safesubst:}}}#expr:{{ {{{|safesubst:}}}Count pages|Talk:{{ {{{|safesubst:}}}PAGENAME}}/GA}} + 1}} |
|GARpage={{ {{{|safesubst:}}}#expr:{{ {{{|safesubst:}}}Count pages|Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/{{ {{{|safesubst:}}}PAGENAME}}/}} + 1}} | |GARpage={{ {{{|safesubst:}}}#expr:{{ {{{|safesubst:}}}Count pages|Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/{{ {{{|safesubst:}}}PAGENAME}}/}} + 1}} | ||
|status= }}|{{error|tag=span|The {{tl|GAR}} template should be '''substituted''' at the top of the article '''talk''' page.}}}}<noinclude> | |status= }}|{{error|tag=span|The {{tl|GAR}} template should be '''substituted''' at the top of the article '''talk''' page.}}}}<noinclude> | ||
{{Documentation}}</noinclude> | {{Documentation}}</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 03:50, 20 June 2019
There are two ways to reassess the Good article status of an article: an individual reassessment, in which one editor makes the final decision; and a community reassessment in which the decision is the result of consensus at a Good article reassessment discussion.
(If you have already created a reassessment page, and the template has not changed, try Script error: No such module "Purge". this talk page.) Date: ~~~~~ |
| This is the template sandbox page for Template:GAR (diff). See also the companion subpage for test cases. |
Template:Substonly Welcome to the suite of Good article reassessment templates.
Usage
To start an individual reassessment of a good article, or request a community reassessment, add {{subst:GAR}} to the top of the article talk page and save the page. This will create two bold links, one to start a new review subpage for an individual reassessment, the other to start a new article reassessment page for a community reassessment.
Follow the appropriate link and add your review or request in the edit box as instructed. For more information see the reassessment guidelines and the documentation for {{GAR/link}}.
See also
{{subst:GAN|subtopic=}}/{{GA nominee}}- Initiates a good article nomination (see the nominating instructions). {{GAN}} converts into {{GA nominee}} when substituted.{{GA}}- Marks articles that are currently good articles: articles that passed their most recent GA nomination and have not been demoted through reassessment since.{{FailedGA}}- Marks articles that failed their most recent GA nomination.{{subst:GAR}}/{{GAR/link}}- Initiates a good article reassessment. {{GAR}} converts into {{GAR/link}} when substituted.{{DelistedGA}}- Marks articles that passed their most recent GA nomination, but were subsequently reassessed and demoted.
| The above documentation is transcluded from Template:GAR/doc. (edit | history) Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox (edit | diff) and testcases (edit) pages. Please add categories to the /doc subpage. Subpages of this template. |