Difference between revisions of "Template:GAR/testcases"
imported>Retro (Revising testcases.) |
imported>Retro (→Namespace test: Note.) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
==Namespace test== | ==Namespace test== | ||
| − | {{hatnote|This is purely intended for testing purposes; it should not be implemented into the actual template}} | + | {{hatnote|This particular is purely intended for temporary testing purposes; it should not be implemented into the actual template}} |
{{tlc|GAR/sandbox|namespace{{=}}Talk}}: | {{tlc|GAR/sandbox|namespace{{=}}Talk}}: | ||
{{GAR/sandbox|namespace=Talk}} | {{GAR/sandbox|namespace=Talk}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Comment: This test shows the template works even when not substituted; ideally, it would display some type of error. | ||
Latest revision as of 03:53, 20 June 2019
| This is the template test cases page for the sandbox of Template:GAR. Script error: No such module "Purge". to update the examples. If there are many examples of a complicated template, later ones may break due to limits in MediaWiki, see the HTML comment "NewPP limit report" in the rendered page. You can also use Special:ExpandTemplates to examine the results of template uses. You can test how this page looks in the different skins with these links: |
Normal use
{{GAR}}:
The {{GAR}} template should be substituted at the top of the article talk page.
{{GAR/sandbox}}:
The {{GAR}} template should be substituted at the top of the article talk page.
Rendering preview
{{GAR|preview=yes}}:
The {{GAR}} template should be substituted at the top of the article talk page.
{{GAR/sandbox|preview=yes}}:
There are two ways to reassess the Good article status of an article: an individual reassessment, in which one editor makes the final decision; and a community reassessment in which the decision is the result of consensus at a Good article reassessment discussion.
(If you have already created a reassessment page, and the template has not changed, try Script error: No such module "Purge". this talk page.) Date: ~~~~~ |
Namespace test
{{GAR/sandbox|namespace=Talk}}:
There are two ways to reassess the Good article status of an article: an individual reassessment, in which one editor makes the final decision; and a community reassessment in which the decision is the result of consensus at a Good article reassessment discussion.
(If you have already created a reassessment page, and the template has not changed, try Script error: No such module "Purge". this talk page.) Date: ~~~~~ |
- Comment: This test shows the template works even when not substituted; ideally, it would display some type of error.