Difference between revisions of "Template:GATable"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>SilkTork
(links)
imported>SNUGGUMS
(tweak)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
{{GATable/item|2a|?|
 
{{GATable/item|2a|?|
 
}}
 
}}
−
<!-- It provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines. -->
+
<!-- All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines. -->
 
{{GATable/item|2b|?|
 
{{GATable/item|2b|?|
 
}}  
 
}}  

Revision as of 21:34, 14 November 2014

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1.
  1. REDIRECT Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC:
1a}}.
Don't know 1b}}.
2.
  1. REDIRECT Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC:
Don't know 2a}}.
Don't know 2b}}.
Don't know 2c}}.
3.
  1. REDIRECT Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC:
Don't know 3a}}.
Don't know 3b}}.
Don't know 4}}.
Don't know 5}}.
6.
  1. REDIRECT Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC:
Don't know 6a}}.
Don't know 6b}}.
16px 7. Overall assessment.
50px Template documentation[view] [edit] [history] [purge]

Usage

Substitute this template with the code: {{subst:GATable}} into a review of a good article nomination, or an individual reassessment, to provide a review table which displays the current good article criteria and allows you to comment on whether the article meets them or not.

The first column uses the same syntax as {{GAList}} and {{GAList2}} to indicate the current status of the article with respect to each criterion, as a parameter for {{GATable/item}}.

This template has one parameter and produces an image depending on the parameter value:
  • "pass", "good", "yes", "ok", "k", "+", "y", "aye" all produce a pass symbol: 16px
  • "fail", "bad", "no", "n", "-", "nk", "nay" all produce a fail symbol: 16px
  • "dunno", "?", "??", "???" all produce a question symbol: Don't know
  • "wtf" produces Wikipedia's "I am out of my comfort zone" symbol: 16px
  • "hold" and "on hold" produce the on hold symbol: 16px
  • "neu" and "und" produce the neutral symbol: 16px

If a review comment contains a url, it may not be recognised, and will show as "Pending". To fix this, add "3=" to the beginning of the comment (immediately after the vertical bar preceding the comment).