Difference between revisions of "Template:GATable/doc"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Retro
(More specific subcategory.)
imported>Vanisaac
m (→‎Usage: clean up per WP:CAT#T and WP:AWBREQ add template:Sandbox other)
 
Line 10: Line 10:
 
If a review comment contains a url, it may not be recognised, and will show as "'''Pending'''". To fix this, add "3=" to the beginning of the comment (immediately after the vertical bar preceding the comment).
 
If a review comment contains a url, it may not be recognised, and will show as "'''Pending'''". To fix this, add "3=" to the beginning of the comment (immediately after the vertical bar preceding the comment).
  
<includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|sandbox | |
+
<includeonly>{{Sandbox other||
 
<!--Categories below this line, please; interwikis at Wikidata-->
 
<!--Categories below this line, please; interwikis at Wikidata-->
 
[[Category:GA discussion templates]]
 
[[Category:GA discussion templates]]
 
}}</includeonly>
 
}}</includeonly>

Latest revision as of 15:18, 25 April 2020

Usage

Substitute this template with the code: {{subst:GATable}} into a review of a good article nomination, or an individual reassessment, to provide a review table which displays the current good article criteria and allows you to comment on whether the article meets them or not.

The first column uses the same syntax as {{GAList}} and {{GAList2}} to indicate the current status of the article with respect to each criterion, as a parameter for {{GATable/item}}.

This template has one parameter and produces an image depending on the parameter value:

  • "pass", "good", "yes", "ok", "k", "+", "y", "aye" all produce a pass symbol:
  • "fail", "bad", "no", "n", "-", "nk", "nay" all produce a fail symbol:
  • "dunno", "?", "??", "???" all produce a question symbol:
  • "wtf" produces Wikipedia's "I am out of my comfort zone" symbol: I am out of my comfort zone
  • "hold" and "on hold" produce the on hold symbol: 16px
  • "neu" and "und" produce the neutral symbol:


If a review comment contains a url, it may not be recognised, and will show as "Pending". To fix this, add "3=" to the beginning of the comment (immediately after the vertical bar preceding the comment).