Difference between revisions of "Template:GA nominee/sandbox"
imported>Headbomb (ce) |
imported>Headbomb (+<p>) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
{{#if: {{{page|}}} | {{#if: {{{page|}}} | ||
| {{#ifexist: <includeonly>{{FULLPAGENAME}}/GA{{{page|1}}}</includeonly> | | {{#ifexist: <includeonly>{{FULLPAGENAME}}/GA{{{page|1}}}</includeonly> | ||
| − | | {{#switch: {{GAN/Status|{{{status}}}}} | + | | <p>{{#switch: {{GAN/Status|{{{status}}}}} |
| on hold=An editor has placed this article on hold to allow improvements to be made to satisfy the [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|good article criteria]]. Recommendations have been left on '''[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}/GA{{{page|1}}}|the review page]]''', and editors have {{{time|seven days}}} to address these issues. Improvements made in this period will influence the reviewer's decision whether or not to list the article as a [[Wikipedia:Good articles|good article]]. | | on hold=An editor has placed this article on hold to allow improvements to be made to satisfy the [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|good article criteria]]. Recommendations have been left on '''[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}/GA{{{page|1}}}|the review page]]''', and editors have {{{time|seven days}}} to address these issues. Improvements made in this period will influence the reviewer's decision whether or not to list the article as a [[Wikipedia:Good articles|good article]]. | ||
| 2nd opinion=An editor has reviewed the article, and left comments on '''[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}/GA{{{page|1}}}|the review page]]'''. However, this editor has requested a second opinion either from a more experienced reviewer, or someone with more expertise on this subject, to gain further consensus that this article meets the [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|good article criteria]]. In the meantime, editors are encouraged to revise the article based on the first reviewer's comments. | | 2nd opinion=An editor has reviewed the article, and left comments on '''[[{{FULLPAGENAME}}/GA{{{page|1}}}|the review page]]'''. However, this editor has requested a second opinion either from a more experienced reviewer, or someone with more expertise on this subject, to gain further consensus that this article meets the [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|good article criteria]]. In the meantime, editors are encouraged to revise the article based on the first reviewer's comments. | ||
Revision as of 02:33, 2 October 2020
| GA nominee/sandbox is currently a good article nominee. Nominated by an unspecified nominator at an unspecified date. To complete the template use: {{GA nominee|~~~~~|nominator=~~~|page=1|status=|subtopic=}}
Please use the
|
| This is the template sandbox page for Template:GA nominee (diff). See also the companion subpage for test cases. |
{{Wikipedia:Article alerts/Bot use warning}}
Usage
This template adds articles to Category:Good article nominees. It is created automatically by the template substitution Template:Tlps, which should be placed at the top of the talk page of the nominated article.
The syntax is as follows:
{{GA nominee|~~~~~|nominator=|page=|status=|subtopic=|note=|time=}}
An explanation of each parameter:
- ~~~~~ — Produces a timestamp. This field is populated automatically upon substituting {{GAN}}
- nominator — The one who nominated the article for good article status. This field is populated automatically upon substituting {{GAN}}
- page — The page number of the good article review; for example, if an article has never had a good article review before, then page=1. This field is populated automatically upon substituting {{GAN}}
- status — The status of the GA review. A message indicating the status will appear beneath the article's entry on the nominations page and near the top of the article talk page. Statuses include:
- onreview: the article is in the process of being reviewed
- onhold: the reviewer has encountered issues with the article and is prescribing an amount of time for them to be corrected
- 2ndopinion: the reviewer is in search of a second opinion
- subtopic — The GA subtopic that is applicable to this page. See the subtopics on the good article page or the instructions page. This parameter is normally populated, except for miscellaneous nominations (Example: the subtopic may be "Biology and medicine").
- note — A miscellaneous note related to the article or the nomination. This note will appear beneath the article's entry on the nominations page and near the top of the article talk page.
- time — The amount of time, as stated as a phrase, prescribed by the reviewer for the nominator to address issues with the article while the status is on hold. This phrase will appear near the top of the article talk page. The default is "seven days".
Technical note
This template uses {{GAN/editintro}}, {{GAN/preload}} and {{subst:GAN/subst}} to provide further instructions and assistance when starting the review subpage.
See also
{{subst:GAN|subtopic=}}/{{GA nominee}}- Initiates a good article nomination (see the nominating instructions). {{GAN}} converts into {{GA nominee}} when substituted.{{GA}}- Marks articles that are currently good articles: articles that passed their most recent GA nomination and have not been demoted through reassessment since.{{FailedGA}}- Marks articles that failed their most recent GA nomination.{{subst:GAR}}/{{GAR/link}}- Initiates a good article reassessment. {{GAR}} converts into {{GAR/link}} when substituted.{{DelistedGA}}- Marks articles that passed their most recent GA nomination, but were subsequently reassessed and demoted.
| The above documentation is transcluded from Template:GA nominee/doc. (edit | history) Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox (edit | diff) and testcases (edit) pages. Please add categories to the /doc subpage. Subpages of this template. |