Difference between revisions of "Template:GAchecklist"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Steven Walling m (→Good Article nomination: grammar) |
imported>Steven Walling (reduce padding, this is too big as it is) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Good Article nomination== | ==Good Article nomination== | ||
| − | <div style="padding: | + | <div style="padding:5px; border: 3px solid #50C878;"> |
:''This article was nominated for [[WP:GA|good article]] status. The review began on {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>CURRENTDAY}}, {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>CURRENTYEAR}}. Below is an evaluation of the article, according to the [[Wikipedia:What is a good article?|six good article criteria]].'' | :''This article was nominated for [[WP:GA|good article]] status. The review began on {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>CURRENTDAY}}, {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>CURRENTYEAR}}. Below is an evaluation of the article, according to the [[Wikipedia:What is a good article?|six good article criteria]].'' | ||
Revision as of 01:24, 18 January 2008
Good Article nomination
- This article was nominated for good article status. The review began on January 21, 2026. Below is an evaluation of the article, according to the six good article criteria.
1. Well written?:
- Prose quality:
- Manual of Style compliance:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
- References to sources:
- Citations to reliable sources, where required:
- No original research:
3. Broad in coverage?:
- Major aspects:
- Focused:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
- Fair representation without bias:
5. Reasonably stable?
- No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?: Pass
- Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
- Pass or Fail: 16px
- If you feel the final result of this review has been in error, you may request a reassessment. If the article failed to attain Good Article status after a full review, it may be easier to address any problems identified above, and simply renominate it.