Difference between revisions of "Template:GAchecklist"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Giants27
(rmv double)
imported>Giants27
(whoops)
Line 26: Line 26:
 
:Fair representation without bias:
 
:Fair representation without bias:
  
'''5. Reasonably stable?''' {{GAList/check|yes}}
+
'''5. Reasonably stable?'''
:No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA): Very stable with no vandalism/edit wars.
+
:No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):
  
'''6. Illustrated by [[WP:IMAGES|images]], when possible and appropriate?:''' {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#if: {{{images|}}}|{{{images}}}| }}
+
'''6. Illustrated by [[WP:IMAGES|images]], when possible and appropriate?:''' {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#if: {{{images|}}}|{{{images}}}| Pass }}
:Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have [[Wikipedia:Image_description_page#Use_rationale|fair use rationales]]: {{GAList/check|yes}}
+
:Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have [[Wikipedia:Image_description_page#Use_rationale|fair use rationales]]:
:Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with [[WP:CAP|suitable captions]]: {{GAList/check|???}} The article reasonable captions but has no alt text per [[WP:ALT]]
+
:Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with [[WP:CAP|suitable captions]]:
  
 
'''Overall''':  
 
'''Overall''':  

Revision as of 02:35, 6 September 2009

Good Article nomination

This article was nominated for good article status. The review began on January 17, 2026. Below is an evaluation of the article, according to the six good article criteria.


1. Well written?:

Prose quality:
Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:
Citations to reliable sources, where required:
No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:
Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?: Pass

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:

Pass or Fail:


If you feel the final result of this review has been in error, you may request a reassessment. If the article failed to attain Good Article status after a full review, it may be easier to address any problems identified above, and simply renominate it.