Difference between revisions of "Template:GAchecklist"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>23W |
imported>CaroleHenson (→Good Article nomination: just starting - but have an initial comment - more to come after thorough read-through) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:[[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]] compliance: | :[[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]] compliance: | ||
<!-- PAY PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO THE LEAD SECTION, WHICH IS FREQUENTLY PROBLEMATIC --> | <!-- PAY PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO THE LEAD SECTION, WHICH IS FREQUENTLY PROBLEMATIC --> | ||
| + | :* Lead - | ||
| + | :* [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Titles#Translations]] {{good}} - Engligh translations not in italics appropriate in this case | ||
'''2. Factually accurate and [[WP:V|verifiable]]?:''' | '''2. Factually accurate and [[WP:V|verifiable]]?:''' | ||
Revision as of 02:22, 31 August 2014
Good Article nomination
- This article was nominated for good article status. The review began on January 15, 2026. Below is an evaluation of the article, according to the six good article criteria.
1. Well written?:
- Prose quality:
- Manual of Style compliance:
- Lead -
- Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Titles#Translations style="background: #bfd; color: black; vertical-align: middle; text-align: center; " class="yes2 table-yes2"| Good - Engligh translations not in italics appropriate in this case
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
- References to sources:
- Citations to reliable sources, where required:
- No original research:
3. Broad in coverage?:
- Major aspects:
- Focused:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
- Fair representation without bias:
5. Reasonably stable?
- No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?: Pass
- Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
- Pass or Fail: 16px
- If you feel the final result of this review has been in error, you may request a reassessment. If the article failed to attain Good Article status after a full review, it may be easier to address any problems identified above, and simply renominate it.
See also
- {{GAList}}