Difference between revisions of "Template:GAchecklist"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>CaroleHenson (→Good Article nomination: upd) |
imported>CaroleHenson (→Good Article nomination: comments so far) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
'''1. Well written?:''' | '''1. Well written?:''' | ||
− | :Prose quality: | + | :Prose quality: ''The quality if pretty good, but more editing should be done for encyclopedic tone and brevity.'' |
:[[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]] compliance: | :[[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]] compliance: | ||
<!-- PAY PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO THE LEAD SECTION, WHICH IS FREQUENTLY PROBLEMATIC --> | <!-- PAY PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO THE LEAD SECTION, WHICH IS FREQUENTLY PROBLEMATIC --> | ||
− | :* Lead - | + | :* Lead - it was well-written and I made a few minor tweaks, there may be some content (awards, etc.) that might be good to add to the intro |
:* [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Titles#Translations|MOS Title translations]]: '''good''' - English translations not in italics appropriate in this case | :* [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Titles#Translations|MOS Title translations]]: '''good''' - English translations not in italics appropriate in this case | ||
+ | :* Citations: I added a question about long/short citation style in the article talk section below. | ||
+ | :* Sections: Good to review the [[WP:Manual of Style/Visual arts]] and [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout]] regarding sections. There may be some shuffling of the sections / content grouping from awards down. For example see GA [[Vincent van Gogh]], [[Auguste Rodin]] | ||
'''2. Factually accurate and [[WP:V|verifiable]]?:''' | '''2. Factually accurate and [[WP:V|verifiable]]?:''' | ||
− | :References to sources: | + | :References to sources: Material is cited, generally with foreign language sources. Good faith assumption that sources cover the cited content. |
− | :Citations to reliable sources, where required: | + | :Citations to reliable sources, where required: Yes |
− | :[[WP:NOR|No original research]]: | + | :[[WP:NOR|No original research]]: No indication of an issue |
'''3. Broad in coverage?:''' | '''3. Broad in coverage?:''' | ||
− | :Major aspects: | + | :Major aspects: Yes, covers his biographical, educational and career information well |
− | :Focused: | + | :Focused: Yes, focuses on the types of works made by Bauer |
'''4. Reflects a [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]]?:''' | '''4. Reflects a [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]]?:''' | ||
− | :Fair representation without bias: | + | :Fair representation without bias: Yes |
'''5. Reasonably stable?''' | '''5. Reasonably stable?''' | ||
− | :No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA): | + | :No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA): No indication of edit wards |
'''6. Illustrated by [[WP:IMAGES|images]], when possible and appropriate?:''' {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#if: {{{images|}}}|{{{images}}}| Pass }} | '''6. Illustrated by [[WP:IMAGES|images]], when possible and appropriate?:''' {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#if: {{{images|}}}|{{{images}}}| Pass }} |
Revision as of 04:19, 31 August 2014
Good Article nomination
- This article was nominated for good article status. The review began on September 16, 2025. Below is an evaluation of the article, according to the six good article criteria.
1. Well written?:
- Prose quality: The quality if pretty good, but more editing should be done for encyclopedic tone and brevity.
- Manual of Style compliance:
- Lead - it was well-written and I made a few minor tweaks, there may be some content (awards, etc.) that might be good to add to the intro
- MOS Title translations: good - English translations not in italics appropriate in this case
- Citations: I added a question about long/short citation style in the article talk section below.
- Sections: Good to review the WP:Manual of Style/Visual arts and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout regarding sections. There may be some shuffling of the sections / content grouping from awards down. For example see GA Vincent van Gogh, Auguste Rodin
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
- References to sources: Material is cited, generally with foreign language sources. Good faith assumption that sources cover the cited content.
- Citations to reliable sources, where required: Yes
- No original research: No indication of an issue
3. Broad in coverage?:
- Major aspects: Yes, covers his biographical, educational and career information well
- Focused: Yes, focuses on the types of works made by Bauer
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
- Fair representation without bias: Yes
5. Reasonably stable?
- No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA): No indication of edit wards
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?: Pass
- Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- If you feel the final result of this review has been in error, you may request a reassessment. If the article failed to attain Good Article status after a full review, it may be easier to address any problems identified above, and simply renominate it.
See also
- {{GAList}}