Difference between revisions of "Template:GAstart"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>SilkTork (update) |
imported>SilkTork (media) |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
#:: | #:: | ||
#Does it '''contain media such as images, [[Wikipedia:Images|images]], [[Wikipedia:Videos|video]], or audio ''' to illustrate the topic? | #Does it '''contain media such as images, [[Wikipedia:Images|images]], [[Wikipedia:Videos|video]], or audio ''' to illustrate the topic? | ||
| − | #:A. | + | #:A. Media are [[Wikipedia:File copyright tags|tagged]] with their [[Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright|copyright status]], and [[Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline|valid fair use rationales]] are provided for [[Wikipedia:Non-free content|non-free content]]: {{GAList/check|}} |
#:: | #:: | ||
| − | #:B. | + | #:B. Media are provided if possible and are [[Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Images#Pertinence_and_encyclopedic_nature|relevant]] to the topic, and have [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Captions|suitable captions]]: {{GAList/check|}} |
#:: | #:: | ||
Revision as of 11:23, 20 November 2019
I'll start reading over the next few days and then begin to make comments. I am normally a slow reviewer - if that is likely to be a problem, please let me know as soon as possible. I tend to directly do copy-editing and minor improvements as I'm reading the article rather than list them here; if there is a lot of copy-editing to be done I may suggest getting a copy-editor (on the basis that a fresh set of eyes is helpful). Anything more significant than minor improvements I will raise here. I see the reviewer's role as collaborative and collegiate, so I welcome discussion regarding interpretation of the criteria. SilkTork (talk)
Tick box
GA review – see Wikipedia:Good article criteria for detailed criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. Prose is clear and concise, understandable, without spelling and grammar errors:
- B. Complies with MoS guidance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- A. Prose is clear and concise, understandable, without spelling and grammar errors:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- D. No copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain media such as images, images, video, or audio to illustrate the topic?
- A. Media are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Media are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Media are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
Comments on GA criteria
- Pass
- Query
- Fail