Difference between revisions of "Template:Importance section/doc"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>AnOddName
(fix generic list template tag (was breaking it intentional?))
imported>Funandtrvl
m (ce)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Documentation subpage}}
 
{{Documentation subpage}}
  
==Usage==
+
===Usage===
 
 
 
This [[Wikipedia:Template|template]] does not place tagged articles into any cleanup categories. This template is a [[Wikipedia:Avoid self-references|self-reference]]. It should not be [[Wikipedia:Template substitution|substituted]].
 
This [[Wikipedia:Template|template]] does not place tagged articles into any cleanup categories. This template is a [[Wikipedia:Avoid self-references|self-reference]]. It should not be [[Wikipedia:Template substitution|substituted]].
  
 
The principal distinction between {{Tl|Notability}} and {{Tl|Importance-section}}, aside from the obvious fact that the former is for entire articles and the latter for sections, is that articles are subject to [[Wikipedia:Notability|notability guidelines]] and the [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|notability requirements, in some cases, in Wikipedia's deletion policy]]; "notability" in Wikipedia does not equate to a ''subjective determination'' of "importance".  On the other hand, sections in an article about a clearly notable subject should be of [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|encyclopedic merit]] and both [[Wikipedia:Guide to writing better articles|relevant]] to the topic of the article and [[Wikipedia:Trivia|non-trivial]] (i.e. "important" in the context).
 
The principal distinction between {{Tl|Notability}} and {{Tl|Importance-section}}, aside from the obvious fact that the former is for entire articles and the latter for sections, is that articles are subject to [[Wikipedia:Notability|notability guidelines]] and the [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|notability requirements, in some cases, in Wikipedia's deletion policy]]; "notability" in Wikipedia does not equate to a ''subjective determination'' of "importance".  On the other hand, sections in an article about a clearly notable subject should be of [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|encyclopedic merit]] and both [[Wikipedia:Guide to writing better articles|relevant]] to the topic of the article and [[Wikipedia:Trivia|non-trivial]] (i.e. "important" in the context).
  
==See also==
+
===See also===
 +
* [[Template:Context]]
 
* [[Template:Notability]]
 
* [[Template:Notability]]
* [[Template:Context]]
 
  
 
{{Cleanup template documentation see also section generic list}}
 
{{Cleanup template documentation see also section generic list}}
  
 
<includeonly>
 
<includeonly>
 
 
[[Category:Coherency templates|{{PAGENAME}}]]
 
[[Category:Coherency templates|{{PAGENAME}}]]
 
[[Category:Notability and importance templates|{{PAGENAME}}]]
 
[[Category:Notability and importance templates|{{PAGENAME}}]]
  
 
[[th:Template:ขาดความสำคัญ]]
 
[[th:Template:ขาดความสำคัญ]]
 
 
</includeonly>
 
</includeonly>
{{DEFAULTSORT:{{PAGENAME}}}}
 

Revision as of 20:21, 17 December 2009

Usage

This template does not place tagged articles into any cleanup categories. This template is a self-reference. It should not be substituted.

The principal distinction between {{Notability}} and {{Importance-section}}, aside from the obvious fact that the former is for entire articles and the latter for sections, is that articles are subject to notability guidelines and the notability requirements, in some cases, in Wikipedia's deletion policy; "notability" in Wikipedia does not equate to a subjective determination of "importance". On the other hand, sections in an article about a clearly notable subject should be of encyclopedic merit and both relevant to the topic of the article and non-trivial (i.e. "important" in the context).

See also

Other common cleanup templates