Difference between revisions of "Template:Infobox court case/testcases"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Arctic.gnome
(test)
imported>Underlying lk
(new testcases)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Template test cases notice}}
 
{{Template test cases notice}}
{{Wikipedia:Featured list tools|Template:Infobox Court Case/testcases}}
 
  
{{Infobox Court Case
+
{{Testcase table
| name              =  
+
| name              = Tennessee v. Scopes
| court             =[[Judicial Committee of the Privy Council]]
+
| image             =
| image             =  
+
| court             = Criminal Court of Tennessee
| imagesize          =
+
| full name          = The State of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes
| imagelink          =
+
| date decided      = July 21, 1925
| imagealt          =
+
| citations          = None
| caption            =
+
| judges            = [[John T. Raulston]]
| full name          =  
+
| prior actions      =  
| date decided      = test date
+
| subsequent actions = ''[[Scopes Trial#Appeal to Supreme Court of Tennessee|Scopes v. State (1926)]]''
| citations          = test citations
+
| opinions          =  
| transcripts        =  
+
|italic title = no}}
| judges            = Test judges
 
| number of judges  =
 
| decision by        =
 
| prior actions      = test prior
 
  
| subsequent actions =  
+
{{Testcase table |
| related actions    = test RA
+
name=Dow Jones & Co. Inc. v Gutnick |
| opinions          =  
+
court=[[High Court of Australia]] |
| keywords          = test keywords
+
date decided=10 December 2002 |
| italic title      =
+
full name= Dow Jones & Company Inc. v Gutnick, Joseph |
}}
+
citations= {{Cite AustLII|HCA|56|2002}}, 210 CLR 575, 194 ALR 433, 77 ALJR 255|
 +
judges=[[Murray Gleeson|Gleeson]] CJ, [[Mary Gaudron|Gaudron]], [[Michael McHugh|McHugh]], [[William Gummow|Gummow]], [[Michael Kirby (judge)|Kirby]], [[Kenneth Hayne|Hayne]] & [[Ian Callinan|Callinan]] JJ |
 +
prior actions=Appeal from [[Supreme Court of Victoria]]|
 +
subsequent actions=none |
 +
opinions=
 +
'''(7:0)''' Existing principles of defamation law are that legal proceedings should be undertaken in the place where the communication is received, not where the communication is sent from.  This applies equally to internet communications, despite the new nature of the technology. <small> (per Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow & Hayne JJ; Gaudron J concurring; Kirby J & Callinan J agreeing in separate judgments)</small>
 +
'''(7:0)''' In this case, involving information published on the Internet in the United States and read in the State of Victoria, Australia, the suitable jurisdiction for a court action is Victoria. <small> (per Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow & Hayne JJ; Gaudron J concurring; Kirby J & Callinan J agreeing in separate judgments) </small>}}
  
{{infobox court case/sandbox|
+
{{Testcase table
|name=Edwards v. Canada (Attorney General)
+
|name               = Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation (Tools)
|court=[[Judicial Committee of the Privy Council]]
+
|court             = [[Court of Appeal of England and Wales]]
|image=
+
|image             =
|date decided= October 18, 1929
+
|imagesize          =
|full name=Edwards v. Canada (Attorney General)
+
|imagelink          =
|citations=[1930] A.C. 124, [http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKPC/1929/1929_86.html 1929 UKPC 86].
+
|imagealt          =  
|number of judges=5
+
|caption            =  
|judges=Lord [[John Sankey, 1st Viscount Sankey|Sankey]], L.C., Lord [[Charles Darling, 1st Baron Darling|Darling]], Lord [[Henry Duke, 1st Baron Merrivale|Merrivale]], Lord [[Thomas Tomlin, Baron Tomlin|Tomlin]], and Sir [[Lancelot Sanderson]]
+
|full name         = 
|decision by=Viscount Sankey
+
|date decided      = {{Start date|1947|11|10}}
|prior actions=test prior
+
|citations         = {{Cite BAILII|court=EWCA|division=Civ|year=1947|num=1}}
|subsequent actions=test sub
+
|transcripts        =  
|related actions=test related
+
|judges             = [[Lord Greene]], Somervell LJ, Singleton J
|appealed from=[[Supreme Court of Canada]]
+
|number of judges  =
|appealed to=a monkey
+
|decision by       =  
|keywords=test 1
+
|prior actions     =
|opinions=test 2
+
|appealed from      =
 +
|appealed to        =
 +
|subsequent actions =  
 +
|related actions   =
 +
|opinions          =  
 +
|keywords          = {{flatlist|*[[Judicial review]]}}
 +
|italic title      =
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 05:33, 18 October 2013

  1. REDIRECT Template:Testcases notice
  • From a page move: This is a redirect from a page that has been moved (renamed). This page was kept as a redirect to avoid breaking links, both internal and external, that may have been made to the old page name.

Template:Testcase table

Template:Testcase table

Template:Testcase table