Difference between revisions of "Template:Infobox court case/testcases"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Arctic.gnome (test) |
imported>Underlying lk (new testcases) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Template test cases notice}} | {{Template test cases notice}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | {{ | + | {{Testcase table |
| − | | name = | + | | name = Tennessee v. Scopes |
| − | | | + | | image = |
| − | | | + | | court = Criminal Court of Tennessee |
| − | + | | full name = The State of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes | |
| − | + | | date decided = July 21, 1925 | |
| − | + | | citations = None | |
| − | + | | judges = [[John T. Raulston]] | |
| − | | full name = | + | | prior actions = |
| − | | date decided = | + | | subsequent actions = ''[[Scopes Trial#Appeal to Supreme Court of Tennessee|Scopes v. State (1926)]]'' |
| − | | citations = | + | | opinions = |
| − | | | + | |italic title = no}} |
| − | | | ||
| − | | | ||
| − | | | ||
| − | | | ||
| − | | | + | {{Testcase table | |
| − | | | + | name=Dow Jones & Co. Inc. v Gutnick | |
| − | | | + | court=[[High Court of Australia]] | |
| − | | | + | date decided=10 December 2002 | |
| − | | | + | full name= Dow Jones & Company Inc. v Gutnick, Joseph | |
| − | }} | + | citations= {{Cite AustLII|HCA|56|2002}}, 210 CLR 575, 194 ALR 433, 77 ALJR 255| |
| + | judges=[[Murray Gleeson|Gleeson]] CJ, [[Mary Gaudron|Gaudron]], [[Michael McHugh|McHugh]], [[William Gummow|Gummow]], [[Michael Kirby (judge)|Kirby]], [[Kenneth Hayne|Hayne]] & [[Ian Callinan|Callinan]] JJ | | ||
| + | prior actions=Appeal from [[Supreme Court of Victoria]]| | ||
| + | subsequent actions=none | | ||
| + | opinions= | ||
| + | '''(7:0)''' Existing principles of defamation law are that legal proceedings should be undertaken in the place where the communication is received, not where the communication is sent from. This applies equally to internet communications, despite the new nature of the technology. <small> (per Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow & Hayne JJ; Gaudron J concurring; Kirby J & Callinan J agreeing in separate judgments)</small> | ||
| + | '''(7:0)''' In this case, involving information published on the Internet in the United States and read in the State of Victoria, Australia, the suitable jurisdiction for a court action is Victoria. <small> (per Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow & Hayne JJ; Gaudron J concurring; Kirby J & Callinan J agreeing in separate judgments) </small>}} | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{Testcase table |
| − | |name= | + | |name = Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation (Tools) |
| − | |court=[[ | + | |court = [[Court of Appeal of England and Wales]] |
| − | |image= | + | |image = |
| − | | | + | |imagesize = |
| − | |full name= | + | |imagelink = |
| − | |citations= | + | |imagealt = |
| − | | | + | |caption = |
| − | |judges= | + | |full name = |
| − | |decision by= | + | |date decided = {{Start date|1947|11|10}} |
| − | |prior actions= | + | |citations = {{Cite BAILII|court=EWCA|division=Civ|year=1947|num=1}} |
| − | |subsequent actions= | + | |transcripts = |
| − | |related actions= | + | |judges = [[Lord Greene]], Somervell LJ, Singleton J |
| − | | | + | |number of judges = |
| − | | | + | |decision by = |
| − | + | |prior actions = | |
| − | + | |appealed from = | |
| + | |appealed to = | ||
| + | |subsequent actions = | ||
| + | |related actions = | ||
| + | |opinions = | ||
| + | |keywords = {{flatlist|*[[Judicial review]]}} | ||
| + | |italic title = | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 05:33, 18 October 2013
- REDIRECT Template:Testcases notice
- From a page move: This is a redirect from a page that has been moved (renamed). This page was kept as a redirect to avoid breaking links, both internal and external, that may have been made to the old page name.