Difference between revisions of "Template:Infobox court case/testcases"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>KylieTastic
(Removed missing (red-linked) image - add Example.jpg instead of image (Stops being flagged on Category:Templates with missing files))
imported>Stratoprutser
Line 12: Line 12:
 
| subsequent actions = ''[[Scopes Trial#Appeal to Supreme Court of Tennessee|Scopes v. State (1926)]]''
 
| subsequent actions = ''[[Scopes Trial#Appeal to Supreme Court of Tennessee|Scopes v. State (1926)]]''
 
| opinions          =  
 
| opinions          =  
|italic title = no}}
+
|italic title = no
 +
| ECLI = ECLI:NL:blabla}}
  
 
{{Testcase table |
 
{{Testcase table |
Line 25: Line 26:
 
opinions=
 
opinions=
 
'''(7:0)''' Existing principles of defamation law are that legal proceedings should be undertaken in the place where the communication is received, not where the communication is sent from.  This applies equally to internet communications, despite the new nature of the technology. <small> (per Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow & Hayne JJ; Gaudron J concurring; Kirby J & Callinan J agreeing in separate judgments)</small>
 
'''(7:0)''' Existing principles of defamation law are that legal proceedings should be undertaken in the place where the communication is received, not where the communication is sent from.  This applies equally to internet communications, despite the new nature of the technology. <small> (per Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow & Hayne JJ; Gaudron J concurring; Kirby J & Callinan J agreeing in separate judgments)</small>
'''(7:0)''' In this case, involving information published on the Internet in the United States and read in the State of Victoria, Australia, the suitable jurisdiction for a court action is Victoria. <small> (per Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow & Hayne JJ; Gaudron J concurring; Kirby J & Callinan J agreeing in separate judgments) </small>}}
+
'''(7:0)''' In this case, involving information published on the Internet in the United States and read in the State of Victoria, Australia, the suitable jurisdiction for a court action is Victoria. <small> (per Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow & Hayne JJ; Gaudron J concurring; Kirby J & Callinan J agreeing in separate judgments) </small>
 +
| ECLI = ECLI:EU:blabla}}}}
  
 
{{Testcase table
 
{{Testcase table

Revision as of 15:10, 26 October 2014

  1. REDIRECT Template:Testcases notice
  • From a page move: This is a redirect from a page that has been moved (renamed). This page was kept as a redirect to avoid breaking links, both internal and external, that may have been made to the old page name.

Template:Testcase table

Template:Testcase table}}

Template:Testcase table

Template:Testcase table

Script error: No such module "If empty".
Script error: No such module "If empty".
CourtAbcd
Full case nameAbcd
Argued1 January, 1 March 19701 February – 1 March 1970
Reargued1 January 19711 March–1 April 19711 February 19721 May–1 June 1972
Submitted1 July 1973
Decided2 July 1973
Citation(s)Abcd
ClaimAbcd
Case history
Prior historyAbcd
Subsequent historyAbcd
Procedural historyAbcd
Holding
Script error: No such module "If empty".
Court membership
Judge(s) sittingAbcd
Case opinions
Per curiam
MajorityAbcd, joined by Abcd
MajorityAbcd, joined by Abcd
MajorityAbcd, joined by Abcd
PluralityAbcd, joined by Abcd
Seriatim opinionAbcd
Seriatim opinionAbcd
Seriatim opinionAbcd
Seriatim opinionAbcd
Seriatim opinionAbcd
ConcurrenceAbcd, joined by Abcd
ConcurrenceAbcd, joined by Abcd
ConcurrenceAbcd, joined by Abcd
ConcurrenceAbcd, joined by Abcd
ConcurrenceAbcd, joined by Abcd
Concur/dissentAbcd, joined by Abcd
Concur/dissentAbcd, joined by Abcd
Concur/dissentAbcd, joined by Abcd
Concur/dissentAbcd, joined by Abcd
Concur/dissentAbcd, joined by Abcd
Concur/dissentAbcd, joined by Abcd
Concur/dissentAbcd, joined by Abcd
Concur/dissentAbcd, joined by Abcd
DissentAbcd, joined by Abcd
ConcurrenceAbcd
DissentAbcd, joined by Abcd
ConcurrenceAbcd
DissentAbcd, joined by Abcd
ConcurrenceAbcd
DissentAbcd, joined by Abcd
ConcurrenceAbcd
DissentAbcd, joined by Abcd
Abcd took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Laws applied
Abcd
Superseded by
Abcd
Overruled by
Abcd

Template:Testcase table