Difference between revisions of "Template:Infobox court case/testcases"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>KylieTastic (Removed missing (red-linked) image - add Example.jpg instead of image (Stops being flagged on Category:Templates with missing files)) |
imported>Stratoprutser |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| subsequent actions = ''[[Scopes Trial#Appeal to Supreme Court of Tennessee|Scopes v. State (1926)]]'' | | subsequent actions = ''[[Scopes Trial#Appeal to Supreme Court of Tennessee|Scopes v. State (1926)]]'' | ||
| opinions = | | opinions = | ||
| − | |italic title = no}} | + | |italic title = no |
| + | | ECLI = ECLI:NL:blabla}} | ||
{{Testcase table | | {{Testcase table | | ||
| Line 25: | Line 26: | ||
opinions= | opinions= | ||
'''(7:0)''' Existing principles of defamation law are that legal proceedings should be undertaken in the place where the communication is received, not where the communication is sent from. This applies equally to internet communications, despite the new nature of the technology. <small> (per Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow & Hayne JJ; Gaudron J concurring; Kirby J & Callinan J agreeing in separate judgments)</small> | '''(7:0)''' Existing principles of defamation law are that legal proceedings should be undertaken in the place where the communication is received, not where the communication is sent from. This applies equally to internet communications, despite the new nature of the technology. <small> (per Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow & Hayne JJ; Gaudron J concurring; Kirby J & Callinan J agreeing in separate judgments)</small> | ||
| − | '''(7:0)''' In this case, involving information published on the Internet in the United States and read in the State of Victoria, Australia, the suitable jurisdiction for a court action is Victoria. <small> (per Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow & Hayne JJ; Gaudron J concurring; Kirby J & Callinan J agreeing in separate judgments) </small>}} | + | '''(7:0)''' In this case, involving information published on the Internet in the United States and read in the State of Victoria, Australia, the suitable jurisdiction for a court action is Victoria. <small> (per Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow & Hayne JJ; Gaudron J concurring; Kirby J & Callinan J agreeing in separate judgments) </small> |
| + | | ECLI = ECLI:EU:blabla}}}} | ||
{{Testcase table | {{Testcase table | ||
Revision as of 15:10, 26 October 2014
- REDIRECT Template:Testcases notice
- From a page move: This is a redirect from a page that has been moved (renamed). This page was kept as a redirect to avoid breaking links, both internal and external, that may have been made to the old page name.
| Script error: No such module "If empty". | |
|---|---|
| Script error: No such module "If empty". | |
| Court | Abcd |
| Full case name | Abcd |
| Argued | 1 January, 1 March 19701 February – 1 March 1970 |
| Reargued | 1 January 19711 March–1 April 19711 February 19721 May–1 June 1972 |
| Submitted | 1 July 1973 |
| Decided | 2 July 1973 |
| Citation(s) | Abcd |
| Claim | Abcd |
| Case history | |
| Prior history | Abcd |
| Subsequent history | Abcd |
| Procedural history | Abcd |
| Holding | |
| Script error: No such module "If empty". | |
| Court membership | |
| Judge(s) sitting | Abcd |
| Case opinions | |
| Per curiam | |
| Majority | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Majority | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Majority | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Plurality | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Seriatim opinion | Abcd |
| Seriatim opinion | Abcd |
| Seriatim opinion | Abcd |
| Seriatim opinion | Abcd |
| Seriatim opinion | Abcd |
| Concurrence | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concurrence | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concurrence | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concurrence | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concurrence | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concur/dissent | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concur/dissent | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concur/dissent | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concur/dissent | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concur/dissent | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concur/dissent | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concur/dissent | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concur/dissent | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Dissent | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concurrence | Abcd |
| Dissent | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concurrence | Abcd |
| Dissent | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concurrence | Abcd |
| Dissent | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Concurrence | Abcd |
| Dissent | Abcd, joined by Abcd |
| Abcd took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
| Laws applied | |
| Abcd | |
Superseded by | |
| Abcd | |
Overruled by | |
| Abcd | |